Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Judd A. Gregg's Ratings and Endorsements

Conservative

2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 73%
2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 78%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 71%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 60%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 65%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 89%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 90%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 91%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 70%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 70%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 65%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 57%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 79%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 81%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 90%
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 60
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 70%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 59%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 64%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 38%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 50%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 60%
2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 83%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 83%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 71%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 79%
2007-2009 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 53%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 75%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 82
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 79%
2007-2008 ConservAmerica - Positions 57
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 53%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 72%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 91%
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 64
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 64%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 23%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 66%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 69.8%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 50%
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 72%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 43%
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 29
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 50%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 53%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 71.2%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 45%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 92%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 72%
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 33
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 75%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 57%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 58%
2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 59%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 88%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 84%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 61%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 90%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 97%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 92%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 85%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 87%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 78%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 74%
2002 American Conservative Union - Positions 85%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 82%
2002 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 71%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 67%
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 58%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 86%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2001 American Conservative Union - Positions 88%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 65%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 85%
2000 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 80%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 86%
2000 The John Birch Society - Positions 79%
1999 American Conservative Union - Positions 91%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 68%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 90%
1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 71%
1998 American Conservative Union - Positions 76%
1998 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 75%
1998 The John Birch Society - Positions 50%
1997-1998 60 Plus Association - Positions 70%
1997-1998 Concerned Women for America - Positions 75%
1997 American Conservative Union - Positions 76%
1997 The John Birch Society - Positions 63%
1996 American Conservative Union - Positions 75%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 58%
1995-1996 60 Plus Association - Positions 89%
1995-1996 Concerned Women for America - Positions 67%
1995-1996 The John Birch Society - Positions 67%
1995 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 82%
1995 American Conservative Union - Positions 87%
1994 American Conservative Union - Positions 79%
1993 American Conservative Union - Positions 92%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top