Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Max S. Baucus's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Unemployed and Low-Income

Unemployed and Low-Income

2014 RESULTS - Positions 20%
2014 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 30%
2013-2014 National Hispanic Leadership Agenda - Positions on Economic Empowerment 100%
2013-2014 RESULTS - Positions 20%
2013 Bread for the World - Positions 71%
2013 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 83%
2012 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
2012 RESULTS - Positions 2%
2012 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 91%
2011 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 100%
2010 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 86%
2009 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 71
2008 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Alliance to Stop the War on the Poor - Positions on Affordable Energy 5%
2007-2008 RESULTS - Positions 64%
2007 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions on Poverty Action B
2006 Association of Community Organization for Reform Now (ACORN) - Positions 63%
2005-2006 RESULTS - Positions 83%
2003-2004 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
2003-2004 The Partnership for the Homeless - Positions 100%
2002 American Family Voices - Positions 62%
2001-2002 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
2000 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
1999 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
1998 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
1997 Bread for the World - Positions 20%
1996 Bread for the World - Positions on Addressing World Hunger 43%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top