or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Edward 'Ted' M. Kennedy, Sr.

Edward 'Ted' M. Kennedy, Sr.'s Special Interest Group Ratings

Edward 'Ted' M. Kennedy, Sr.
Full Name: Edward 'Ted' M. Kennedy, Sr.

Foreign Affairs

2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Council for a Livable World - Positions 0%
2009 Latin America Working Group - Positions 0%
2008 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 100%
2008 Peace Action West - Positions 100%
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 0%
2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 70%
2007-2008 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 100%
2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 100%
2007 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 100%
2007 Latin America Working Group - Positions 50%
2007 Peace Action West - Positions 100%
2007 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Positions on Iraq War Amendments 75%
2006 Latin America Working Group - Positions 100%
2006 Peace Action - Positions 89%
2006 Peace Action West - Positions 89%
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 25%
2005-2006 Council for a Livable World - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 83%
2005-2006 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 100%
2005 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A+
2005 Latin America Working Group - Positions 75%
2005 Peace Action - Positions 89%
2005 PeacePAC - Positions 100%
2004 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions 92%
2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
2004 Latin America Working Group - Positions 75%
2004 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 100%
2004 Peace Action - Positions 100%
2003-2004 ACT! for America - Positions 50%
2003-2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 94%
2003 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 89%
2003 Latin America Working Group - Positions 67%
2003 Peace Action - Positions 100%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -1
2002 Peace Action - Positions 80%
2001-2004 Council for a Livable World - Positions 100%
2001-2002 American Foreign Service Association - Positions 67%
2001-2002 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -2
2001-2002 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 100%
2001 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 92%
2001 Peace Action - Positions 57%
2000 Council for a Livable World - Positions 75%
2000 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 82%
2000 Peace Action - Positions 44%
1999-2000 PeacePAC - Positions 75%
1999 Council for a Livable World - Positions 57%
1999 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 64%
1999 Peace Action - Positions 38%
1998 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 80%
1998 Peace Action - Positions 67%
1997-1998 Council for a Livable World - Positions 90%
1997 Council for a Livable World - Positions 100%
1997 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 93%
1997 Peace Action - Positions 67%
1996 Council for a Livable World - Positions 100%
1996 Peace Action - Positions 100%
1995-1996 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Peace and Justice Score 100%
1995 Peace Action - Positions 92%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top