or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Barbara A. Mikulski

Barbara A. Mikulski's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Animals and Wildlife

Full Name: Barbara A. Mikulski
Current Office: U.S. Senate - Sr, Democratic
First Elected: 11/04/1986
Last Elected: 11/02/2010
Next Election: 2016

Animals and Wildlife

2013 American Veterinary Medical Assoctiation - Positions on Professional Advocacy 50%
2013 Animal Welfare Institute - Compassion Index 50%
2013 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 83%
2013 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 66%
2012 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 0%
2012 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 70%
2011-2012 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 100%
2011 American Veterinary Medical Assoctiation - Positions on Professional Advocacy 0%
2011 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 60%
2010-2011 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2010 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2009-2010 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 33%
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2009 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 33%
2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 91%
2007-2008 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions on Animal Protection 83%
2007-2008 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 83
2007-2008 The National Mining Association - Positions 50%
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 80%
2007 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions on Animal Protection 75
2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 82%
2005-2006 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 100
2005-2006 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 80%
2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 100%
2005 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 100%
2004 American Humane Association - Positions 80%
2004 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 80%
2004 Born Free USA - Positions 80%
2004 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2004 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 0%
2004 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 80
2004 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 80
2003-2004 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 100%
2003 American Humane Association - Positions 80%
2003 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 80%
2003 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 80%
2003 Born Free USA - Positions 80%
2003 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 91%
2003 Doris Day Animal League - Positions 80%
2003 Sierra Club - Positions 60%
2003 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 80%
2003 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 80%
2001-2002 American Humane Association - Positions 80%
2001-2002 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 80%
2001-2002 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 60%
2001-2002 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 80%
2001-2002 Born Free USA - Positions 80%
2001-2002 Doris Day Animal League - Positions 80%
2001-2002 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 80%
2001-2002 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 80%
2000 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 50%
2000 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 80
1999-2000 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 80%
1999 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 50%
1995-1996 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 75%
1995 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 75%
1993-1994 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 80%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top