Senator Charles 'Chuck' E. Grassley's Special Interest Group Ratings

Office: U.S. Senate (IA) - Sr, Republican
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Defense

2014 Peace Action West - Positions (June 3, 2014) 0% 2013-2014 Center for Security Policy - Positions 93% 2013 Peace Action West - Positions (Nov. 20, 2013) 0% 2011-2012 Center for Security Policy - Positions 100% 2009-2012 Council for a Livable World - Positions (Senate) 17% 2009-2010 Center for Security Policy - Positions 100% 2009-2010 Council for a Livable World - Positions 11% 2008 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Iraq-Afghanistan Supplemental Spending Score 33% 2007-2008 Center for Security Policy - Positions 100% 2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 0% 2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 0% 2007 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Positions on Iraq War Amendments 50% 2005-2006 Center for Security Policy - Positions 84% 2005-2006 Council for a Livable World - Positions 8% 2005 PeacePAC - Positions 13% 2005 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 0% 2003-2004 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 9% 2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 97% 2001-2004 Council for a Livable World - Positions 0% 2001-2002 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 13% 2000 Council for a Livable World - Positions 25% 1999-2000 PeacePAC - Positions 25% 1999 Council for a Livable World - Positions 29% 1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 84% 1998-2002 Center for Security Policy - Positions 75% 1998 National Journal - Liberal on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 26% 1998 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 71% 1997-1998 Council for a Livable World - Positions 10% 1997 Center for Security Policy - Positions 86% 1997 Council for a Livable World - Positions 17% 1996 Center for Security Policy - Positions 71% 1996 Council for a Livable World - Positions 36% 1996 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign\Defense Policy 50% 1996 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 49%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.