Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

Charles 'Chuck' E. Grassley's Ratings and Endorsements

Office: U.S. Senate (IA) - Sr, Republican

2010 Endorsements

Conservative

2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 84%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (June 23, 2014) 89%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score (June 23, 2014) 85%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 88%
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 82%
2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 85%
2014 The John Birch Society - Lifetime Score 61%
2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 90%
2013-2014 The New American - Positions (captured September 2, 2014) 80%
2013 American Conservative Union - Positions 88%
2013 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 84%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 91%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy 87%
2013 National Journal - Conservative (Composite) 89%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 80%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 70%
2013 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 85
2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 83%
2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 72%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2012 National Journal - Senate Conservative (Composite Score) 75%
2012 National Journal - Senate Conservative (Foreign) 85%
2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 78%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 70%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 85%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 77%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 94%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 79%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 84%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 90%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 91%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 46%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 71%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 26%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 79%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 60%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 65%
2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 65%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 88%
2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 84%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 72%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 76%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 100%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 96%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 96%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 90%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 87%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 90%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 84%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 0
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 95%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 74%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 69%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 80%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 85%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 90%
2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 76%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 87%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 82.3%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 84%
2007-2009 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 38%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 76%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 100
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 75%
2007-2008 ConservAmerica - Positions 48
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 38%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 84%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 75%
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 43
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 88%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 30%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 92%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 77.2%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 70%
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 88%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 43%
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 0
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 77.3%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 67%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 40%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 7
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 75%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 74%
2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 75%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 68%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 93%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 61%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 90%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 80%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 87%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 78%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 87%
2002 American Conservative Union - Positions 95%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 75%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 76%
2002 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 79%
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 65%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 97%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 87%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2001 American Conservative Union - Positions 92%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 72%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 80%
2000 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 86%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 67%
2000 The John Birch Society - Positions 72%
1999 American Conservative Union - Positions 92%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 84%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 75%
1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 70%
1998 American Conservative Union - Positions 80%
1998 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 71%
1998 The John Birch Society - Positions 45%
1997-1998 60 Plus Association - Positions 60%
1997-1998 Concerned Women for America - Positions 75%
1997 American Conservative Union - Positions 80%
1997 The John Birch Society - Positions 55%
1996 American Conservative Union - Positions 90%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 49%
1995-1996 60 Plus Association - Positions 89%
1995-1996 Concerned Women for America - Positions 75%
1995-1996 The John Birch Society - Positions 61%
1995 American Conservative Union - Positions 91%
1995 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 80%
1994 American Conservative Union - Positions 92%
1993 American Conservative Union - Positions 88%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top