or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

[x] close
Print Track This Candidate

Richard 'Dick' G. Lugar

Richard 'Dick' G. Lugar's Special Interest Group Ratings

Richard 'Dick' G. Lugar
Full Name: Richard 'Dick' G. Lugar

Filter by Issue:

Budget, Spending and Taxes

2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 24%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 74%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 41%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 70%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 59%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 30%
2011 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 84%
2010 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 84%
2010 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 91%
2009 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 82%
2009 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 76%
2008 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 66%
2008 Citizens Against Government Waste - Lifetime Score 77%
2007-2008 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 72%
2007 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 70%
2007 FreedomWorks - Positions 42%
2006 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 75%
2006 FreedomWorks - Positions 50%
2006 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 67%
2005-2006 Citizens for Tax Justice - Positions 0%
2005-2006 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 80%
2005 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 90%
2005 FreedomWorks - Positions 63%
2005 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 61%
2005 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 10%
2004 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 85%
2004 American Shareholders Association - Positions 100%
2004 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 70%
2004 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 0%
2003-2004 FreedomWorks - Positions 71%
2003-2004 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 95%
2003 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 85%
2003 American Shareholders Association - Positions 91%
2003 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 73%
2002 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 70%
2002 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 70%
2002 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 27%
2001-2002 Concord Coalition - Positions 74%
2001-2002 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 94%
2001 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 90%
2001 American Shareholders Association - Positions 100%
2001 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 81%
2001 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 60%
2000 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 90%
2000 Concord Coalition - Positions 22%
2000 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 29%
1999-2000 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 94%
1999 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 75%
1999 Concord Coalition - Positions 26%
1999 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 76%
1998 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 65%
1998 Concord Coalition - Positions 70%
1998 National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score 63%
1998 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 32%
1997-1998 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 68%
1997 Concord Coalition - Positions 67%
1997 National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score 67%
1997 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 38%
1996 Concord Coalition - Positions 71%
1995-1996 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 93%
1995 Concord Coalition - Positions 52%
1995 National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score 87%
1994 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Taxes Score 100%
1994 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Deregulation Score 86%
1994 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Total Score 62%
1994 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Spending Score 62%
1994 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Budget Score 57%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

About Project Vote Smart

Help Us If You Can

Media & Communications

Education

For Candidates

One Common Ground, Philipsburg, MT 59858 Hotline: 888-Vote-Smart (888-868-3762)
All content © 1992 - 2013 Project Vote Smart unless otherwise attributed - Privacy Policy - Legislative demographic data provided by Aristotle International, Inc. Mobile Version

Back to top