Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Daniel Kahikina Akaka, Sr.'s Ratings and Endorsements

Liberal

2012 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 90%
2012 National Journal - Senate Liberal (Foreign) 68%
2012 National Journal - Senate Liberal (Composite Score) 79%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 69%
2011 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2011 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 87%
2010 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 85%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 47%
2010 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 78%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 72%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 77%
2009 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 68%
2009 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 84%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 55%
2008 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 65%
2008 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 87%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 56%
2007 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 79%
2007 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 73.3%
2006 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2006 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 83.5%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 95%
2005-2006 Campaign for America's Future - Energy Score 100%
2005 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2005 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 95%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 76%
2005 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 79%
2004 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2004 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 99%
2003-2004 Democrats for Life of America - Positions 0%
2003-2004 Radical Middle - Positions 25%
2003 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 90%
2003 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 95%
2003 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 78%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 68%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 79%
2002 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 80%
2002 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 84%
2001-2002 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 95%
2001-2002 Radical Middle - Positions 25%
2001 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2001 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 98%
2001 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 74%
2000 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 85%
2000 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 69%
1999 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
1998 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 85%
1998 National Journal - Liberal on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 65%
1997-1998 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 95%
1997 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
1996 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
1996 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign\Defense Policy 64%
1995-1996 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 95%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top