Vice President Joseph 'Joe' Robinette Biden, Jr.'s Special Interest Group Ratings

Biographical

Full Name: Joseph 'Joe' Robinette Biden, Jr.
Current Office: Vice President, Democratic
First Elected: 11/04/2008
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Gender: Male
Family: Wife: Jill; 4 Children: Beau, Hunter, Ashley, Naomi (deceased)
Birth Date: 11/20/1942
Birth Place: Scranton, PA
Home City: Wilmington, DE
Religion: Roman Catholic
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Liberal

2008 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 80% 2008 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 80% 2008 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 63% 2008 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 91% 2008 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 91% 2008 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 85% 2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Oath of Office Score 50% 2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Oath of Office Score 50% 2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Right Wing Index Score 0% 2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 50% 2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 50% 2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Right Wing Index Score 0% 2007 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 75% 2007 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 75% 2007 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 75% 2007 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 94% 2007 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 94.2% 2007 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 98% 2007 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 86% 2007 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions on Social Justice and Peace 75 2007 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions on Social Justice and Peace 75 2006 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100% 2006 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100% 2006 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100% 2006 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 73% 2006 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 77.5% 2006 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 65% 2006 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 87% 2006 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 88% 2006 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 88% 2005-2006 Campaign for America's Future - Energy Score 83% 2005-2006 Campaign for America's Future - Energy Score 83% 2005 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100% 2005 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100% 2005 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100% 2005 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 90% 2005 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 90% 2005 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 83% 2005 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 80% 2005 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 73% 2005 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 76% 2005 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100% 2005 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100% 2004 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95% 2004 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95% 2004 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100% 2004 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 69% 2004 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 93% 2004 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 69% 2004 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 86% 2004 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 86% 2003-2004 Democrats for Life of America - Positions 33% 2003-2004 Radical Middle - Positions 10% 2003 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 75% 2003 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 75% 2003 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 36% 2003 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 95% 2003 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 95% 2003 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 60% 2003 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 75% 2003 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 82% 2003 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 77% 2003 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 80% 2003 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 80% 2002 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 80% 2002 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 80% 2002 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 75% 2002 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 64% 2002 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 90% 2002 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 67% 2002 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 67% 2001-2002 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 90% 2001-2002 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 90% 2001-2002 People for the American Way - Positions 85% 2001-2002 People for the American Way - Positions 85% 2001-2002 Radical Middle - Positions 30% 2001 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100% 2001 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100% 2001 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100% 2001 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 90% 2001 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 90% 2001 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 87% 2001 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 81% 2000 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 80% 2000 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 90% 2000 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 79% 2000 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 70% 2000 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 69% 2000 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 82% 2000 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 82% 1999 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 46% 1999 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 60% 1999 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 80% 1999 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 82% 1999 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 82% 1998 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 85% 1998 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 85% 1998 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 64% 1998 National Journal - Liberal on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 73% 1998 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 63% 1998 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 73% 1998 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 73% 1997-1998 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 85% 1997-1998 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 85% 1997 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 70% 1997 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 70% 1997 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 34% 1996 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 80% 1996 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 80% 1996 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 43% 1996 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 57% 1996 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign\Defense Policy 89% 1996 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 80% 1996 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 80% 1995-1996 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 85% 1995-1996 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 85% 1995 The Libertarian Party - Positions 30% 1995 The Libertarian Party - Positions 20% 1995 The Libertarian Party - Positions 40%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.