or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Christopher 'Chris' J. Dodd

Christopher 'Chris' J. Dodd's Special Interest Group Ratings

Christopher 'Chris' J. Dodd
Full Name: Christopher 'Chris' J. Dodd

Foreign Affairs

2010 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 0%
2010 Peace Action - Positions 79%
2010 Peace Action West - Positions 79%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 50%
2009-2010 Council for a Livable World - Positions 88%
2009-2010 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 63%
2009 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 30%
2009 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 40%
2009 Latin America Working Group - Positions 100%
2009 Peace Action West - Positions 60%
2008 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 100%
2008 Peace Action West - Positions 80%
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 0%
2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 70%
2007-2008 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 100%
2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 77%
2007 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 100%
2007 Latin America Working Group - Positions 75%
2007 Peace Action West - Positions 88%
2007 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Positions on Iraq War Amendments 75%
2006 Latin America Working Group - Positions 67%
2006 Peace Action - Positions 56%
2006 Peace Action West - Positions 56%
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 33%
2005-2006 Council for a Livable World - Positions 83%
2005-2006 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 92%
2005-2006 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 83%
2005 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A+
2005 Latin America Working Group - Positions 75%
2005 Peace Action - Positions 89%
2005 PeacePAC - Positions 100%
2004 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions 69%
2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
2004 Latin America Working Group - Positions 25%
2004 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 100%
2004 Peace Action - Positions 88%
2003-2004 ACT! for America - Positions 50%
2003-2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 88%
2003 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 89%
2003 Latin America Working Group - Positions 67%
2003 Peace Action - Positions 100%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -1
2002 Peace Action - Positions 40%
2001-2004 Council for a Livable World - Positions 75%
2001-2002 American Foreign Service Association - Positions 68%
2001-2002 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -3
2001-2002 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 75%
2001 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 85%
2001 Peace Action - Positions 29%
2000 Council for a Livable World - Positions 63%
2000 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 70%
2000 Peace Action - Positions 44%
1999-2000 PeacePAC - Positions 63%
1999 Council for a Livable World - Positions 43%
1999 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
1999 Peace Action - Positions 38%
1998 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 80%
1998 Peace Action - Positions 50%
1997-1998 Council for a Livable World - Positions 80%
1997 Council for a Livable World - Positions 83%
1997 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 86%
1997 Peace Action - Positions 42%
1996 Council for a Livable World - Positions 55%
1996 Peace Action - Positions 64%
1995-1996 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Peace and Justice Score 85%
1995 Peace Action - Positions 67%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top