Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

Barbara Boxer's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: National Security

Office: U.S. Senate (CA) - Jr, Democratic

National Security

2014 Peace Action West - Positions (June 3, 2014) 75%
2013 Peace Action West - Positions (Nov. 20, 2013) 67%
2011-2012 ACT! for America - Positions 0%
2011-2012 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 20%
2011-2012 Center for Security Policy - Positions 0%
2011 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 30%
2010 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 20%
2009-2012 Council for a Livable World - Positions (Senate) 100%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 50%
2009-2010 Center for Security Policy - Positions 16%
2009-2010 Council for a Livable World - Positions 100%
2009 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 30%
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 0%
2007-2008 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 30%
2007-2008 Center for Security Policy - Positions 0%
2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 90%
2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 95%
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 25%
2005-2006 Center for Security Policy - Positions 21%
2005-2006 Council for a Livable World - Positions 91%
2005 PeacePAC - Positions 88%
2003-2004 ACT! for America - Positions 50%
2003-2004 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 0%
2002 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 50%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 4%
2001-2004 Council for a Livable World - Positions 100%
2000 Council for a Livable World - Positions 75%
1999-2000 PeacePAC - Positions 75%
1999 Council for a Livable World - Positions 57%
1998-2002 Center for Security Policy - Positions 5%
1997-1998 Council for a Livable World - Positions 90%
1997 Center for Security Policy - Positions 0%
1997 Council for a Livable World - Positions 100%
1996 Center for Security Policy - Positions 7%
1996 Council for a Livable World - Positions 91%
1993-1994 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top