or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Ted Stevens

Ted Stevens's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Marriage, Family, and Children

Full Name: Ted Stevens

Marriage, Family, and Children

2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 71%
2007-2008 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 80%
2007-2008 Family Research Council - Positions 66%
2007-2008 Population Action International - Positions 100%
2007 American Academy of Family Physicians - Positions 100%
2007 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 70%
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 58%
2007 Family Research Council - Positions 57
2007 League of Women Voters - Children's Health Issues Score 100%
2007 Population Connection - Positions on Population Stabilization 100%
2006 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 10%
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 33%
2006 Family Research Council - Positions 87%
2006 Population Connection - Positions 13%
2005-2006 American Family Association - Positions 33%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 79%
2005-2006 Population Action International - Positions on Reproductive Health 100%
2005 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 11%
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 50%
2005 Population Connection - Positions 20%
2004 American Family Association - Positions 100%
2004 American Humane Association - Positions 0%
2004 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 83%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2004 Family Research Council - Positions 67%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 89%
2003-2004 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 9%
2003-2004 National Parent Teacher Association - Positions 0%
2003-2004 Population Action International - Positions 33%
2003-2004 Population Connection - Positions 43%
2003 American Family Association - Positions 100%
2003 American Humane Association - Positions 0%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 92%
2003 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 83%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 87%
2003 Family Research Council - Positions 57%
2003 National Network for Youth - Positions 0%
2003 Population Action International - Positions 50%
2003 Population Connection - Positions 50%
2002 American Family Voices - Positions 0%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 60%
2002 Population Connection - Positions 25%
2001-2002 American Humane Association - Positions 33%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 93%
2001-2002 Family Research Council - Positions 56%
2001-2002 National Parent Teacher Association - Positions 11%
2001 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 18%
2001 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 80%
2001 National Youth Advocacy Coalition - Positions 0%
2001 Population Connection - Positions 0%
2000 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 30%
2000 Family Research Council - Positions 50%
2000 Population Connection - Positions 38%
1999-2000 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 69%
1999-2000 Home School Legal Defense Association - Positions 80%
1999 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 20%
1999 Population Connection - Positions 40%
1998 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 56%
1997-1998 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 73%
1997-1998 Home School Legal Defense Association - Positions 60%
1997-1998 Population Connection - Positions 83%
1997 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 27%
1997 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 57%
1997 Population Connection - Positions 100%
1996 Children's Defense Fund - Positions 20%
1996 Population Connection - Positions 50%
1995-1996 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 69%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top