Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Ted Stevens's Ratings and Endorsements

Conservative

2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 50%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 71%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 58%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 59%
2007-2009 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 26%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 56%
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 53%
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 26%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 64%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 66%
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 25
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 58%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 24%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 64%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 66%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 50%
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 64%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0%
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 14
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 33%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 64%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 74%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 31%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 79%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 80%
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions -10
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 50%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 72%
2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 71%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 74%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 92%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 81%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 67%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 80%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 89%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 86%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 70%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 92%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 89%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 87%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 66%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 68%
2002 American Conservative Union - Positions 83%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 60%
2002 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 75%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 76%
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 40%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 93%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 62%
2001 American Conservative Union - Positions 92%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 54%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 72%
2000 American Conservative Union - Positions 92%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 57%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 58%
2000 The John Birch Society - Positions 62%
1999 American Conservative Union - Positions 84%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 65%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 67%
1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 52%
1998 American Conservative Union - Positions 56%
1998 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 36%
1998 The John Birch Society - Positions 32%
1997-1998 60 Plus Association - Positions 60%
1997-1998 Concerned Women for America - Positions 75%
1997 American Conservative Union - Positions 58%
1997 The John Birch Society - Positions 37%
1996 American Conservative Union - Positions 80%
1996 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 58%
1995-1996 60 Plus Association - Positions 83%
1995-1996 Concerned Women for America - Positions 67%
1995-1996 The John Birch Society - Positions 54%
1995 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 64%
1995 American Conservative Union - Positions 73%
1994 American Conservative Union - Positions 77%
1993 American Conservative Union - Positions 80%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top