or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Ted Stevens

Ted Stevens's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

Full Name: Ted Stevens

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

2008 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 30%
2008 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions on Middle Class Advocacy 50
2007-2008 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 21%
2007-2008 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 20%
2007-2008 National Organization for Women - Positions 44%
2007-2008 The Arc - Positions 100%
2007-2008 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -1
2007 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 29
2007 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 25%
2007 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions on Middle Class Advocacy 40
2007 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 0%
2007 League of Women Voters - Civil Liberties and Civil Rights Score 0%
2007 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 33%
2007 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur C
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 100%
2006 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 5%
2006 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 0%
2006 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 7%
2006 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur F
2005-2006 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 17%
2005-2006 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 0%
2005-2006 Iranian American Political Action Committee - Positions 100%
2005-2006 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 14%
2005-2006 National Organization for Women - Positions 13%
2005-2006 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -3
2005 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 5%
2005 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 0%
2005 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 0%
2005 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 10%
2005 National Council of La Raza - Positions 50%
2005 National Organization for Women - Positions 0%
2004 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 20%
2004 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 14%
2003-2004 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 0%
2003-2004 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 13%
2003-2004 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 7%
2003-2004 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 33%
2003-2004 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 15%
2003-2004 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -1
2003 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 10%
2003 Drum Major Institute for Public Policy/TheMiddleClass.org - Positions 67%
2003 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 6%
2003 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 7%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -1
2001-2002 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 20%
2001-2002 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 0%
2001-2002 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 0%
2001-2002 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 13%
2001-2002 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 18%
2001-2002 People for the American Way - Positions 15%
2001 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 0%
2001 Common Cause - Positions 50%
2001 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 0%
2001 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 18%
2001 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 14%
2000 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 29%
2000 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 50%
2000 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 40%
1999-2000 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 29%
1999-2000 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 44%
1999 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 33%
1999 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 17%
1999 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 40%
1998 National Organization for Women - Positions 20%
1997-1998 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 50%
1997-1998 Home School Legal Defense Association - Positions 60%
1997-1998 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 50%
1997-1998 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 40%
1997-1998 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 36%
1997 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 33%
1996 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 11%
1995-1996 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 33%
1995-1996 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 35%
1995-1996 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 30%
1991-1992 National Gay & Lesbian Task Force - Positions 9%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top