Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Robert Meza's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Environment

Office: State Senate (AZ) - District 30, Democratic

Environment

2014 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation 87%
2013 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation 68%
2012 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation 80%
2011 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 92%
2011 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Positions 90%
2011 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation 60%
2010 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation B
2009 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Positions 88%
2009 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation B
2008 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Positions on Environmental Conservation 73
2008 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation C
2007 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2007 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation A+
2006 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Positions 93%
2006 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation A
2005 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2005 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions 80%
2004 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2004 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation A
2003 Arizona League of Conservation Voters - Positions 93%
2003 Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter - Positions on Environmental Conservation A

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top