Representative Cary Condotta's Special Interest Group Ratings

Office: State House (WA) - 12 Position 1, Republican
On The Ballot: Running, Republican for State House - 12 Position 1
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Labor Unions

2016 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 18% 2016 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Scores 13% 2015 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 0% 2015 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Scores 12% 2014 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 13% 2014 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Scores 13% 2013 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 20% 2013 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 13% 2012 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Scores 13% 2012 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 7% 2011 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Scores 14% 2011 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Postions 10% 2010 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 14% 2010 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 0% 2009 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 25% 2008 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions on Workplace Rights 10 2007 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions on Workplace Rights 0 2006 Washington Public Employees Association - Positions 50% 2006 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 42% 2005 Washington Public Employees Association - Positions 14% 2005 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 0% 2004 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 25% 2003-2004 Washington Public Employees Association - Positions 50% 2003 Washington Public Employees Association - Positions 40% 2003 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 10%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.