Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Debbie Ann Stabenow's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Animals and Wildlife

Office: U.S. Senate (MI) - Sr, Democratic

Animals and Wildlife

2015 American Veterinary Medical Association - Positions on Professional Advocacy 100%
2015 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2015 Food Policy Action - Positions 100%
2015 Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 86%
2014 American Veterinary Medical Association - Positions on Professional Advocacy 100%
2014 Food Policy Action - Positions 50%
2014 Goldwater Institute - Positions 87%
2014 Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance - Positions 25%
2013-2014 Food Policy Action - Positions 50%
2013-2014 Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 87%
2013 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 50%
2013 Goldwater Institute - Positions 83%
2012 Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance - Positions 25%
2011-2012 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 40%
2011-2012 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 86%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 61%
2011-2012 Goldwater Institute - Positions 56%
2011 American Veterinary Medical Association - Positions on Professional Advocacy 100%
2011 Goldwater Institute - Positions 0%
2010-2011 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2010 Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 83%
2009-2010 Goldwater Institute - Positions 44%
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 75%
2009 Goldwater Institute - Positions 50%
2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 82%
2007-2008 Goldwater Institute - Positions on Animal Protection 67%
2007-2008 Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 67%
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 60%
2007 Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions on Animal Protection 75%
2006 Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance - Positions 0%
2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 73%
2005-2006 Goldwater Institute - Positions 80%
2005-2006 Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 80%
2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 100%
2005 Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 60%
2004 American Humane Association - Positions 80%
2004 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 80%
2004 Born Free USA - Positions 80%
2004 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2004 Goldwater Institute - Positions 80%
2004 Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 80%
2004 Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance - Positions 0%
2003-2004 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 100%
2003 American Humane Association - Positions 80%
2003 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 80%
2003 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 80%
2003 Born Free USA - Positions 80%
2003 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 91%
2003 Doris Day Animal League - Positions 80%
2003 Goldwater Institute - Positions 80%
2003 Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 80%
2003 Sierra Club - Positions 60%
2001-2002 American Humane Association - Positions 86%
2001-2002 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 86%
2001-2002 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 80%
2001-2002 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 86%
2001-2002 Born Free USA - Positions 86%
2001-2002 Doris Day Animal League - Positions 86%
2001-2002 Goldwater Institute - Positions 86%
2001-2002 Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 86%
1999-2000 Goldwater Institute - Positions 50%
1999 Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 83%
1997 Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions on Animal Protection 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top