Representative Judy Clibborn's Special Interest Group Ratings

Office: State House (WA) - 41 Position 2, Democratic
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for State House - 41 Position 2
View 2016 Endorsements
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Business and Consumers

2015 Association of Washington Business - Lifetime Score 43% 2015 Association of Washington Business - Labor Score 100% 2015 Association of Washington Business - Positions 38% 2014 Associated General Contractors of Washington - Positions 39% 2014 Association of Washington Business - Positions 29% 2014 Association of Washington Business - Lifetime Score 44% 2014 Association of Washington Business - Labor Score 90% 2013-2014 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 10% 2013 Association of Washington Business - Labor Score 79% 2013 Association of Washington Business - Positions 59% 2013 Association of Washington Business - Lifetime Score 45% 2012 Association of Washington Business - Positions 44% 2011-2012 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 20% 2011 Association of Washington Business - Positions 60% 2010 Association of Washington Business - Positions 28% 2010 Association of Washington Business - Lifetime Score 41% 2009-2010 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 33% 2009 Association of Washington Business - Positions 58% 2008 Association of Washington Business - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 35 2007-2008 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions on Pro-Small Business Policy 42 2007 Association of Washington Business - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 28 2007 Building Industry Association of Washington - Housing Industry Advocacy Score 29 2007 JobMakers - Job Creation Score 32% 2006 Association of Washington Business - Positions 43% 2006 JobMakers - Job Creation Score 50% 2005-2006 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 46% 2005 Association of Washington Business - Positions 25% 2005 Building Industry Association of Washington - Positions 0% 2004 Association of Washington Business - Positions 60% 2003-2004 Washington National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 67% 2003 Association of Washington Business - Positions 54%

Labor Unions

2016 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 91% 2016 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Scores 82% 2015 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 100% 2015 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Scores 81% 2014 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 90% 2014 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Scores 80% 2013 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 100% 2013 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 79% 2012 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Scores 77% 2012 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 68% 2011 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Scores 78% 2011 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Postions 42% 2010 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 85% 2010 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 70% 2009 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 50% 2008 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions on Workplace Rights 90 2007 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions on Workplace Rights 100 2006 Washington Public Employees Association - Positions 100% 2006 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 100% 2005 Washington Public Employees Association - Positions 100% 2005 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 100% 2004 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 83% 2003-2004 Washington Public Employees Association - Positions 85% 2003 Washington Public Employees Association - Positions 70% 2003 Washington State Labor Council, AFL-CIO - Positions 60%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.