or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Eric I. Cantor

Eric I. Cantor's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Government Operations

Full Name: Eric I. Cantor
Current Office: U.S. House - District 7, Republican
First Elected: 11/07/2000
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Education Categories MS, Columbia University, 1989 Higher Education JD, College of William and Mary School of Law, 1988 Higher Education,Legal BA, George Washington University, 1985 Higher Education

Government Operations

2013 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 2%
2013 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 10%
2013 Bread for the World - Positions 30%
2013 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 86%
2013 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 86%
2013 FreedomWorks - Positions 52%
2013 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 11%
2013 The Club for Growth - Positions 68%
2013 The Club for Growth - Positions (lifetime) 77%
2012 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 2%
2012 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 0%
2012 Bread for the World - Positions 0%
2012 FreedomWorks - Positions 37%
2012 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 74%
2012 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 74%
2012 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 7%
2012 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 0%
2011 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 0%
2011 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 73%
2011 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 73%
2011 FreedomWorks - Positions 72%
2011 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 73%
2011 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 73%
2011 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 6%
2011 The Club for Growth - Positions 55%
2010 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 91%
2010 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 91%
2010 FreedomWorks - Positions 95%
2010 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 13%
2010 The Club for Growth - Positions 100%
2009-2010 American Immigration Lawyers Association - U.S. House Score 0%
2009-2010 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 95%
2009-2010 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 0%
2009 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 2%
2009 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 10%
2009 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 92%
2009 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 92%
2009 FreedomWorks - Positions 90%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 94%
2009 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 89%
2009 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 89%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 88%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 96%
2009 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 17
2009 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 0%
2009 The Club for Growth - Positions 92%
2008 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 1%
2008 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 11%
2008 Americans for Fair Taxation - Positions on the FairTax 0
2008 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 83%
2008 Citizens Against Government Waste - Lifetime Score 73%
2008 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 83%
2008 Citizens Against Government Waste - Lifetime Score 73%
2008 FreedomWorks - Positions 74%
2008 National Taxpayers Union - Fiscally Conservative Score B
2008 National Taxpayers Union - Fiscally Conservative Score B
2008 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions 24%
2008 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 16%
2008 The Club for Growth - Positions 86%
2007-2008 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 92%
2007-2008 Population Action International - Positions 0%
2007 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 0%
2007 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 100%
2007 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 89%
2007 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 89%
2007 FreedomWorks - Positions 100%
2007 National Employment Lawyers Association - Positions 33%
2007 National Taxpayers Union - Fiscally Conservative Score A
2007 National Taxpayers Union - Fiscally Conservative Score A
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 67%
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 91%
2007 Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions on Poverty Action F
2007 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 0%
2007 The Club for Growth - Positions 82%
2006 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 0%
2006 American Immigration Lawyers Association - Positions 0%
2006 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 100%
2006 Church World Service - Positions 33
2006 FreedomWorks - Positions 75%
2006 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 61%
2006 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 61%
2006 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 11%
2006 The Club for Growth - Positions 72%
2006 The Retired Enlisted Association - Retired Military Benefits Issues Score 7%
2005-2006 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 74%
2005-2006 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 74%
2005-2006 Citizens for Tax Justice - Positions 0%
2005-2006 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 85%
2005-2006 Population Action International - Positions on Reproductive Health 0%
2005 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 0%
2005 American Immigration Lawyers Association - Positions 0%
2005 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 96%
2005 Church World Service - Positions 0
2005 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 74%
2005 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 74%
2005 FreedomWorks - Positions 76%
2005 National Criminal Justice Association - Positions 88%
2005 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 58%
2005 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 58%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 40%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 80%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 60%
2005 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 6%
2005 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 0%
2005 United States Public Interest Research Group - Positions 0%
2004 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 0%
2004 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 100%
2004 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 68%
2004 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 68%
2004 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 69%
2004 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 69%
2004 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 70%
2004 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 29%
2004 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 25%
2003-2004 Bread for the World - Positions 75%
2003-2004 FreedomWorks - Positions 73%
2003-2004 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 89%
2003-2004 Population Action International - Positions 0%
2003 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 0%
2003 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 95%
2003 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
2003 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 74%
2003 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 74%
2003 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 64%
2003 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 64%
2003 Population Action International - Positions 0%
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 90
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 90
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 90
2003 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 0%
2003 State PIRGs Working Together - Positions 0%
2002 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 0%
2002 American Benefits Council - Positions 60%
2002 American Immigration Lawyers Association - Positions 0%
2002 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 100%
2002 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 83%
2002 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 83%
2002 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 57%
2002 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 57%
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 85
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 85
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 85
2002 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 0%
2002 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 17%
2001-2002 American Bar Association - Positions 0%
2001-2002 Bread for the World - Positions 33%
2001-2002 FreedomWorks - Positions 90%
2001-2002 National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare - Positions 23%
2001-2002 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 97%
2001 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 0%
2001 American Benefits Council - Positions 100%
2001 American Immigration Lawyers Association - Positions 50%
2001 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 100%
2001 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 93%
2001 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 93%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 60%
2001 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 70%
2001 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 70%
2001 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 75%
2001 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 25%
2001 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 36%
1995-2004 American Immigration Lawyers Association - Positions 10%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top