or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Rob Bishop

Rob Bishop's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Environment

Full Name: Rob Bishop
Current Office: U.S. House - District 1, Republican
First Elected: 11/05/2002
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House - District 1
General Nov. 4, 2014
Craig Bowden
(Running)
Libertarian
Donna McAleer
(Running)
Democratic
Dwayne Vance
(Running)
Independent American

Environment

2013 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 17%
2013 Environment America - Positions 0%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 8%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 4%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 4%
2012 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 9%
2012 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 4%
2012 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean water (House Only) 0%
2011-2012 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2011-2012 Environment America - Positions 0%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 21%
2011-2012 League of Conservation Voters - Session Score 7%
2011-2012 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions (House Only) 29%
2011 Environment America - Positions 0%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 3%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 6%
2011 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean Water (House Only) 0%
2011 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions (House Only) 8
2010-2011 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 2%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 10%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2009-2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 4%
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 14
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 14
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2009 Environment America - Positions 13%
2009 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2008 Environment America - Positions 0%
2007-2008 ConservAmerica - Positions -4
2007-2008 ConservAmerica - Positions -4
2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2007-2008 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2007-2008 The National Mining Association - Positions 83%
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions -3
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions -3
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2007 League of Conservation Voters - First Session Score 0%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 43%
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 17
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 17
2006 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2006 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 0%
2005-2006 American Forest and Paper Association - Positions 100%
2005-2006 American Lands Alliance - Positions 0%
2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2005-2006 Partnership for America - Positions 100%
2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions -4
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions -4
2005 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 0%
2004 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2003-2004 American Lands Alliance - Positions 0%
2003-2004 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2003-2004 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 3%
2003-2004 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 0%
2003-2004 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 5%
2003 American Lands Alliance - Positions 0%
2003 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 7%
2003 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 5%
2003 Sierra Club - Positions 13%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top