or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Michael C. Burgess

Michael C. Burgess's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Foreign Affairs

Full Name: Michael C. Burgess
Current Office: U.S. House - District 26, Republican
First Elected: 11/05/2002
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House - District 26
General Nov. 4, 2014
Primary March 4, 2014

Foreign Affairs

2013 Bread for the World - Positions 10%
2013 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 57%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 54%
2013 Peace Action West - Positions (Nov. 20, 2013) 28%
2012 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2012 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 4%
2012 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions 38%
2012 Bread for the World - Positions 25%
2012 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 0%
2012 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 20%
2012 National Journal - House Liberal (Foreign) 35%
2012 Peace Action - Positions 7%
2011-2012 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2011-2012 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 17%
2011-2012 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 50%
2011-2012 USA Engage - Positions 50%
2011 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 0%
2011 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 0%
2011 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 17%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 91%
2011 Peace Action West - Positions 17%
2010 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2010 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score F
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 12%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 79%
2010 Peace Action - Positions 25%
2010 Peace Action West - Positions 25%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Council for a Livable World - Positions 16%
2009-2010 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 16%
2009-2010 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -4%
2009-2010 USA Engage - Positions 40%
2009-2010 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 20%
2009 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 87%
2009 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 17%
2009 Latin America Working Group - Positions 0%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 75%
2009 NewPolicy.org - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy 0%
2009 Peace Action West - Positions 8%
2009 Resolve Uganda - Lifetime Score 0%
2009 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2%
2008 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions on Armenian American Issues D
2008 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score D
2008 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 92%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 7%
2008 Peace Action West - Positions 10%
2008 Resolve Uganda - Lifetime Score F
2007-2009 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score F
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 89%
2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 12%
2007-2008 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 0%
2007-2008 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0%
2007-2008 Population Action International - Positions 0%
2007-2008 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -4
2007-2008 USA Engage - Positions on Trade and Engagement F
2007-2008 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions -2
2007 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score D-
2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 0%
2007 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2007 Latin America Working Group - Positions 0%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 28%
2007 Peace Action West - Positions 0%
2007 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2007 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur C
2007 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Iraq-Afghanistan Supplemental Spending Score 17%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 71%
2006 Church World Service - Positions 33
2006 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score F
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 73%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 17%
2006 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2006 Peace Action West - Positions 0%
2006 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur D
2006 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 50%
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 94%
2005-2006 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 6%
2005-2006 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 33%
2005-2006 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0%
2005-2006 Population Action International - Positions on Reproductive Health 0%
2005-2006 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -7
2005 Church World Service - Positions 25
2005 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score F
2005 Council on American-Islamic Relations - Positions 0%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 89%
2005 Peace Action - Positions 8%
2005 PeacePAC - Positions 0%
2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 0%
2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2004 Latin America Working Group - Positions 0%
2004 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 23%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 76%
2004 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0%
2004 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2003-2004 ACT! for America - Positions 87.5%
2003-2004 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -15
2003-2004 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 90%
2003-2004 Bread for the World - Positions 25%
2003-2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 7%
2003-2004 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 50%
2003-2004 PeacePAC - Positions 0%
2003-2004 Population Action International - Positions 0%
2003-2004 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -5
2003-2004 USA Engage - Positions 60%
2003-2004 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 25%
2003 Bread for the World - Positions 0%
2003 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2003 Latin America Working Group - Positions 11%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 80%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 11%
2003 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0%
2003 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2003 Population Action International - Positions 0%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2002-2003 Citizens for Global Solutions - Positions 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top