Al Green
Representative Al Green's Special Interest Group Ratings
Filter by Issue:
- down
- Abortion
- Abortion and Reproductive
- Agriculture and Food
- Animals and Wildlife
- Arts, Entertainment, and History
- Budget, Spending and Taxes
- Business and Consumers
- Campaign Finance and Elections
- Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
- Conservative
- Crime
- Death Penalty
- Defense
- Drugs
- Education
- Employment and Affirmative Action
- Energy
- Environment
- Executive Branch
- Federal, State and Local Relations
- Foreign Affairs
- Gambling and Gaming
- Government Operations
- Guns
- Health and Health Care
- Housing and Property
- Immigration
- Indigenous Peoples
- Judicial Branch
- Labor Unions
- Legislative Branch
- Liberal
- Marriage, Family, and Children
- Military Personnel
- National Security
- Science
- Senior Citizens
- Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
- Social
- Stem Cell Research
- Technology and Communication
- Trade
- Transportation
- Unemployed and Low-Income
- Veterans
- Women
Abortion
Agriculture and Food
| 2011 | American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions | 17% |
| 2009-2010 | American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions | 33% |
| 2009-2010 | National Farmers Union - Positions | 100% |
| 2008 | National Association of Wheat Growers - Positions | 96% |
| 2007-2008 | American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions | 84% |
| 2007-2008 | National Farmers Union - Family Farm Advocacy Score | 100 |
| 2007 | National Association of Wheat Growers - Positions | 90% |
| 2007 | National Council of Agricultural Employers - Positions | 0% |
| 2007 | United Fresh Produce Association - Positions | 100% |
| 2005-2006 | American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions | 58% |
| 2005-2006 | National Farmers Union - Positions | 100% |
| 2005 | National Association of Wheat Growers - Positions | 50% |
| 2005 | National Council of Agricultural Employers - Positions | 33% |
Animals and Wildlife
Arts, Entertainment, and History
Budget, Spending and Taxes
Business and Consumers
Campaign Finance and Elections
| 2008-2011 | Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby | 14% |
| 2007 | League of Women Voters - Campaign Finance and Election Issues Score | 100% |
Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
Conservative
Crime
| 2005-2006 | Citizens United for Rehabilitation of Errants - Positions | 90% |
| 2005 | National Criminal Justice Association - Positions | 72% |
Drugs
Education
Employment and Affirmative Action
| 2009 | Women Employed - Positions | 50% |
| 2008 | Latin America Working Group - Positions | 0% |
| 2007 | National Employment Lawyers Association - Positions | 66% |
Energy
| 2007-2008 | Alliance to Stop the War on the Poor - Positions on Affordable Energy | 11% |
| 2007 | Consumer Alliance for Energy Security - Positions | 50% |
| 2007 | League of Women Voters - Energy Score | 100% |
| 2005-2006 | Campaign for America's Future - Energy Score | 50% |
Entitlements and the Safety Net
| 2011 | Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions | 100% |
| 2009 | Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions | 100% |
| 2009 | Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score | 100% |
| 2008 | Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score | 100% |
| 2008 | Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions | 100% |
| 2007 | Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions | 100% |
| 2006 | Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions | 100% |
| 2005 | Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions | 100% |
Environment
Federal, State and Local Relations
| 2009 | The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions | 20% |
Foreign Affairs
Government Operations
Guns
Health and Health Care
Immigration
Labor Unions
Legislative Branch
| 2008-2011 | Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby | 14% |
| 2007-2008 | Grassroots Netroots Alliance - Positions | 61% |
Liberal
Marriage, Family, and Children
Military Personnel
National Security
| 2010 | American Security Council Foundation - Positions | 20% |
| 2009 | American Security Council Foundation - Positions | 50% |
| 2007-2008 | ACT! for America - Positions | 0% |
| 2007-2008 | American Security Council Foundation - Positions | 20% |
| 2007-2008 | Center for Security Policy - Positions | 9% |
| 2005-2006 | ACT! for America - Positions | 18% |
| 2005-2006 | Center for Security Policy - Positions | 22% |
| 2001-2010 | Keep America Safe - Positions | 13% |
Religion
| 2009-2010 | ACT! for America - Positions | 40% |
| 2007-2008 | ACT! for America - Positions | 0% |
| 2007-2008 | Christian Coalition of America - Positions | 0% |
| 2005-2006 | ACT! for America - Positions | 18% |
Science
Senior Citizens
| 2011 | Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions | 100% |
| 2009-2010 | Alzheimer's Impact Movement - Positions | 33% |
| 2009 | Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score | 100% |
| 2009 | Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions | 100% |
| 2008 | Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score | 100% |
| 2008 | Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions | 100% |
| 2007 | Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions | 100% |
| 2006 | Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions | 100% |
| 2005-2006 | National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association - Positions | 100% |
| 2005 | Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions | 100% |
Social
Socially Liberal
Technology and Communication
| 2012 | TechCrunch/CrunchGov - Positions on Technology Industry | 75% |
| 2009-2010 | Communications Workers of America - Positions | 89% |
| 2008 | CNET News - Positions | 50% |
| 2007-2008 | Information Technology Industry Council - Positions | 86% |
| 2007 | AeA - Positions | 75% |
| 2007 | Computer & Communications Industry Association - Positions | 93% |
| 2006 | CNET News - Positions | 38% |
| 2005-2006 | Computer & Communications Industry Association - Positions | 57% |
| 2005-2006 | Information Technology Industry Council - Positions | 29% |
Trade
| 2009-2010 | International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions | 0% |
| 2009-2010 | USA Engage - Positions | 40% |
| 2008 | The Alliance for Worker Freedom - Positions | 0% |
| 2007-2008 | International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions | 0% |
| 2007-2008 | National Foreign Trade Council - Positions | 50% |
| 2007 | Associated Equipment Distributors - Positions | 85% |
| 2007 | The Alliance for Worker Freedom - Positions | 0% |
| 2005-2006 | National Foreign Trade Council - Positions | 33% |
Unemployed and Low-Income
| 2011 | Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions | 94% |
| 2010 | Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions | 94% |
| 2009 | Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions | 100 |
| 2008 | Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law - Positions | 100% |
| 2007-2008 | Alliance to Stop the War on the Poor - Positions on Affordable Energy | 11% |
| 2007-2008 | RESULTS - Positions | 80% |
| 2005-2006 | RESULTS - Positions | 94% |
Veterans
Women
| 2011 | Federally Employed Women - Positions | 100% |
| 2010 | Federally Employed Women - Positions | 70% |
| 2009 | Federally Employed Women - Positions | 90% |
| 2009 | Women Employed - Positions | 50% |
| 2007-2008 | Federally Employed Women - Equality in Government Score | 70 |
| 2007-2008 | National Organization for Women - Positions | 100% |
| 2007 | Federally Employed Women - Positions | 30% |
| 2006 | United States Women's Chamber of Commerce - Positions | 100% |
| 2005-2006 | Business and Professional Women USA - Positions | 50% |
| 2005-2006 | Federally Employed Women - Positions | 80% |
| 2005-2006 | National Organization for Women - Positions | 91% |
| 2005 | National Organization for Women - Positions | 100% |
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
