Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Marc Veasey's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Environment

Office: U.S. House (TX) - District 33, Democratic
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for U.S. House - District 33

Environment

2015 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2015 Environment America - Positions 70%
2015 Food Policy Action - Positions 64%
2014 Environment America - Positions 80%
2014 Food Policy Action - Positions 72%
2014 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 89%
2013-2014 American Forest and Paper Association - Positions 16%
2013-2014 Clean Water Action - Positions 93%
2013-2014 Food Policy Action - Positions 72%
2013-2014 League of Conservation Voters - Positions (113th Congress, full session) 89%
2013 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 83%
2013 EarthRights International - Positions 13%
2013 Environment America - Positions 100%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 69%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 93%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 93%
2011 Environment Texas - Positions 100%
2011 Environment Texas - Lifetime Score 87%
2011 Sierra Club-Lone Star Chapter - Postions 100%
2011 Texas League of Conservation Voters - Positions 96%
2009 Environment Texas - Positions 100%
2009 Environment Texas - Lifetime Score 84%
2009 Sierra Club-Lone Star Chapter - Positions 100%
2009 Texas Campaign for the Environment - Positions 96%
2009 Texas League of Conservation Voters - Positions 92%
2007 Environment Texas - Positions on Environmental Conservation 67
2007 Texas Campaign for the Environment - Positions 96%
2007 Texas League of Conservation Voters - Positions on Environmental Conservation 96
2005 Environment Texas - Positions on Environmental Conservation 86
2005 Texas League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top