or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Jim Cooper

Representative Jim Cooper's Special Interest Group Ratings

Jim Cooper
Full Name: Jim Cooper
Current Office: U.S. House - District 5, Democratic
First Elected: 11/05/2002
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014

Conservative

2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 24%
2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 24%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 27%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 16%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 24%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 18%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 19%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 40%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 44%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 59%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 56%
2011 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 58%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 42%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 60%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 41%
2011 The Club for Growth - Positions 32%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 10%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 10%
2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 10%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 35%
2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 25%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 22%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 51%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 52%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 46%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 57%
2010 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 48%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 48%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 52%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 43%
2010 The Club for Growth - Positions 24%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 40%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 35%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 8%
2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 20%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 22%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 13%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 18%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 16%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 23%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 9%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 13%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 23%
2009 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 58%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 42%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 35%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 42%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 46%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 30%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 26%
2009 The Club for Growth - Positions 14%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 0%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 20%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 10%
2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 20%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 30%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 46.8%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 49%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 42%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 46%
2008 The Club for Growth - Positions 38%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 10%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 11
2007-2008 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 10%
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 27%
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 13%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 16%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 30%
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 17%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 0%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 51%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 47%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 45.3%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 37%
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 53%
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 31%
2007 Southern Alliance for Clean Energy Action Fund - Positions 88%
2007 The Club for Growth - Positions 98%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 10%
2007 Traditional Values Coalition - Positions 0
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 40%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 100%
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 36.3%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 39%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 38%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 31%
2006 The Club for Growth - Positions 19%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 20%
2006 Traditional Values Coalition - Positions 14%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 33%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 46%
2005-2006 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Conservative Action Score 14%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 24%
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 29%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 42%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 38%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 53%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 55%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 50%
2005 The John Birch Society - Positions 13%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 13%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 30%
2004 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 25%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 21%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 40%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 39%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 29%
2004 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 30%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 10%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring) 29%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 20%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 36%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 36%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 18%
2003 Center for Reclaiming America - Positions 100%
2003 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 25%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 38%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 15%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 38%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 35%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 36%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 42%
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 50
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 50
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 50
2003 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer) 38%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top