Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Creighton B. Coleman's Ratings and Endorsements

Office: State Senate (SC) - District 17, Democratic

Business and Consumers

2013 South Carolina Chamber of Commerce - Positions 82%
2012 South Carolina Business and Industry Political Education Committee - Positions 35
2012 South Carolina Chamber of Commerce - Positions 79%
2011-2012 South Carolina National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 71%
2011 South Carolina Business and Industry Political Education Committee - Positions 34
2011 South Carolina Chamber of Commerce - Positions 60%
2010 South Carolina Business and Industry Political Education Committee - Positions 29.65
2009-2010 South Carolina National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 60%
2009 South Carolina Chamber of Commerce - Positions 83%
2008 South Carolina Business and Industry Political Education Committee - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 36.36
2008 South Carolina Chamber of Commerce - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 91
2007-2008 South Carolina National Federation of Independent Business - Positions on Pro-Small Business Policy 67
2007 South Carolina Business and Industry Political Education Committee - Positions 20.59
2006 South Carolina Business and Industry Political Education Committee - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 3.32
2005-2006 South Carolina Chamber of Commerce - Positions 42%
2005-2006 South Carolina National Federation of Independent Business - Positions on Pro-Small Business Policy 29
2005 South Carolina Chamber of Commerce - Positions 78%
2003 South Carolina Business and Industry Political Education Committee - Positions 32%
2001-2002 South Carolina Business and Industry Political Education Committee - Positions 43%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top