Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

J. David Weeks's Ratings and Endorsements

Office: State House (SC) - District 51, Democratic
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for State House - District 51

Business and Consumers

2015 South Carolina Chamber of Commerce - Positions 95%
2014 South Carolina National Federation of Independent Business - Positions (House Only) 63%
2013 South Carolina Chamber of Commerce - Positions 76%
2012 South Carolina Business and Industry Political Education Committee - Positions 74%
2012 South Carolina Chamber of Commerce - Positions 55%
2011-2012 South Carolina National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 71%
2011 South Carolina Business and Industry Political Education Committee - Positions 38%
2011 South Carolina Chamber of Commerce - Positions 79%
2010 South Carolina Business and Industry Political Education Committee - Positions 49%
2009-2010 South Carolina National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 50%
2009 South Carolina Chamber of Commerce - Positions 63%
2008 South Carolina Business and Industry Political Education Committee - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 46%
2008 South Carolina Chamber of Commerce - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 85
2007-2008 South Carolina National Federation of Independent Business - Positions on Pro-Small Business Policy 83
2007 South Carolina Business and Industry Political Education Committee - Positions 41%
2006 South Carolina Business and Industry Political Education Committee - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 57%
2005-2006 South Carolina Chamber of Commerce - Positions 67%
2005-2006 South Carolina National Federation of Independent Business - Positions on Pro-Small Business Policy 30
2005 South Carolina Chamber of Commerce - Positions 69%
2003-2004 South Carolina National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 20%
2003 South Carolina Business and Industry Political Education Committee - Positions 14%
2002 South Carolina Business and Industry Political Education Committee - Positions 58%

Socially Conservative

2015 American Conservative Union - Positions (State Legislatures) 55%
2015 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Scores (State Legislatures) 55%
2015 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Scores (State Legislatures) 55%
2015 American Conservative Union - Positions (State Legislatures) 55%
2013-2014 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions 54%
2013-2014 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions 54%
2012 Palmetto Liberty Political Action Committee - Positions 13
2012 Palmetto Liberty Political Action Committee - Positions 13
2011-2012 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions 31%
2011-2012 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions 31%
2011 Palmetto Liberty Political Action Committee - Positions 21%
2011 Palmetto Liberty Political Action Committee - Positions 21%
2010 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions (House Only) 62%
2010 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions (House Only) 62%
2007 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions (House Only) 49%
2007 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions (House Only) 49%
2005-2006 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions (House Only) 50%
2005-2006 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions (House Only) 50%
2003-2014 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions (House Only) 51%
2003-2014 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions (House Only) 51%
2003-2010 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions (House Only) 55%
2003-2010 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions (House Only) 55%
2003-2004 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions (House Only) 60%
2003-2004 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions (House Only) 60%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top