or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

David 'Dan' Daniel Boren

David 'Dan' Daniel Boren's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Women

Full Name: David 'Dan' Daniel Boren

Women

2012 Federally Employed Women - Positions 60%
2012 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2011-2012 American Association of University Women - Positions 30
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 80%
2011 American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - Positions (House Only) 0%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 77%
2011 Federally Employed Women - Positions 83%
2011 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 10%
2011 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions (House Only) 15
2010 Federally Employed Women - Positions 50%
2010 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2009-2010 American Association of University Women - Positions 44%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 80%
2009 American Association of University Women - Positions 44%
2009 Federally Employed Women - Positions 70%
2009 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2009 Women Employed - Positions 50%
2007-2008 American Association of University Women - Positions 70%
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 76%
2007-2008 Federally Employed Women - Equality in Government Score 70
2007-2008 National Organization for Women - Positions 63%
2007 American Association of University Women - Positions 50
2007 Federally Employed Women - Positions 60%
2007 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2006 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2006 United States Women's Chamber of Commerce - Positions 56%
2006 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 50%
2005-2006 American Association of University Women - Positions 40%
2005-2006 Business and Professional Women USA - Positions 50%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 79%
2005-2006 Federally Employed Women - Positions 70%
2005-2006 National Organization for Women - Positions 41%
2005 American Association of University Women - Positions 50%
2005 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2005 National Organization for Women - Positions 71%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top