Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

David 'Dan' Daniel Boren's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Labor Unions

Labor Unions

2012 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 37
2012 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Lifetime Score 56%
2012 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 45%
2012 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 44%
2012 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 40%
2011-2012 American Federation of Teachers - Positions 50%
2011-2012 International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions (House) 75%
2011-2012 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 0%
2011 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 69%
2011 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 45%
2011 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Lifetime Score 56%
2011 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 29%
2011 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 42%
2010 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 33%
2010 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 64%
2010 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 60%
2010 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 85%
2010 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - House of Representatives Score 0%
2009-2010 Communications Workers of America - Positions 29%
2009-2010 International Brotherhood of Teamsters - Positions 60%
2009-2010 International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions 88%
2009-2010 National Farmers Union - Positions 38%
2009-2010 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 28%
2009 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 46%
2009 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 57%
2009 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Lifetime Score 61%
2009 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 56%
2009 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 66%
2009 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 60%
2009 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 36%
2009 United Auto Workers - Positions 40%
2009 Women Employed - Positions 50%
2008 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Lifetime Score 62%
2008 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 73%
2008 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 71%
2008 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Lifetime Score 61%
2008 Center for Worker Freedom - Positions 22%
2008 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 66%
2008 Latin America Working Group - Positions 0%
2008 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 83%
2008 Utility Workers Union of America - Positions 66%
2007-2008 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers - Positions 53%
2007-2008 International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions 71%
2007-2008 National Farmers Union - Family Farm Advocacy Score 87
2007-2008 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 60%
2007 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 79%
2007 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 59%
2007 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 44%
2007 Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers - Positions 75%
2007 Center for Worker Freedom - Positions 36%
2007 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 60%
2007 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 60
2007 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 47%
2007 United Auto Workers - Positions 43%
2007 Utility Workers Union of America - Positions 60
2006 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 57%
2006 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 43%
2006 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 83%
2006 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 50%
2006 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 44%
2006 Transportation Communications Union - Positions 83%
2006 United Auto Workers - Positions 54%
2005-2006 American Road and Transportation Builders Association - Positions 66%
2005-2006 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers - Positions 33%
2005-2006 National Farmers Union - Positions 66%
2005 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 62%
2005 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 60%
2005 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 88%
2005 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 67%
2005 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 75%
2005 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 56%
2005 Transportation Communications Union - Positions 66%
2005 United Auto Workers - Positions 43%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top