Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

David 'Dan' Daniel Boren's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Marriage, Family, and Children

Marriage, Family, and Children

2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 75%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 86%
2011 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 90%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 38%
2011 Family Research Council - Positions 80%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 66%
2009-2010 American Family Association - Positions 86%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 83%
2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Family Research Council - Positions 87%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 80%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 54%
2009 Population Connection - Committee Votes Score 0%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 30%
2007-2008 American Family Association - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 75
2007-2008 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 78%
2007-2008 Family Research Council - Positions 70%
2007-2008 Population Action International - Positions 0%
2007 American Academy of Family Physicians - Positions 0%
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 76%
2007 Family Research Council - Positions 68
2007 League of Women Voters - Children's Health Issues Score 100%
2007 PFLAG, Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays - Positions 0%
2007 Population Connection - Positions on Population Stabilization 0%
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 29%
2006 Family Research Council - Positions 71%
2006 Population Connection - Positions 14%
2005-2006 American Family Association - Positions 88%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 83%
2005-2006 Population Action International - Positions on Reproductive Health 0%
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 67%
2005 Family Research Council - Positions 69%
2005 Population Connection - Positions 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top