Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

David 'Dan' Daniel Boren's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Environment

Environment

2012 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 27%
2012 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 9%
2012 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean water (House Only) 0%
2011-2012 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 16%
2011-2012 Environment America - Positions 11%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 50%
2011-2012 League of Conservation Voters - Session Score 16%
2011-2012 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions (House Only) 29%
2011 Environment America - Positions 18%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 23%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 32%
2011 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean Water (House Only) 8%
2011 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions (House Only) 15
2010-2011 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 25%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 60%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 36%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 57%
2009-2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 58%
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 60%
2009 Environment America - Positions 73%
2009 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 57%
2008 Environment America - Positions 15%
2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 25%
2007-2008 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 36%
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2007 League of Conservation Voters - First Session Score 15%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 86%
2006 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2006 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 50%
2005-2006 American Forest and Paper Association - Positions 91%
2005-2006 American Lands Alliance - Positions 0%
2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 16%
2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 20%
2005-2006 Partnership for America - Positions 87%
2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 33%
2005 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 28%
2004 Oklahoma Sierra Club - Positions 56%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top