Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

David 'Dan' Daniel Boren's Ratings and Endorsements

Conservative

2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 60%
2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 51%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 75%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Composite Score) 46%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Foreign) 43%
2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 54%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 59%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 51%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 50%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 86%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 80%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 37%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 48%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 50%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 77%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 38%
2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 43%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 52%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 47%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 46%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 60%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 70%
2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 60%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 38%
2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 50%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 66%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 52%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 56%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 38%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 68%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 83%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 80%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 34%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 33%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 50%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 52%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 44%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 80%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 54%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 56%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 58%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 30%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 20%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 25%
2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 24%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 30%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 52%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 52.8%
2007-2009 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 28%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 33%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 75
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 76%
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 28%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 57%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 57%
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 76%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 0%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 56%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 54%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 40%
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 72%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0%
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 29%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 50%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 50.8%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 37%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 83%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 79%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 64%
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 67%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 42%
2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 48%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 49%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 83%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top