or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Michael 'Mike' R. Turner

Michael 'Mike' R. Turner's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Immigration

Full Name: Michael 'Mike' R. Turner
Current Office: U.S. House - District 10, Republican
First Elected: 11/05/2002
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House - District 10
General Nov. 4, 2014
Primary May 6, 2014

Immigration

2014 Federation for American Immigration Reform - Positions 100%
2014 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Overall Score (Jan. 7, 2014) 64%
2012 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 0%
2012 The American Hellenic Educational Progressive Association - Legislation Evaluation (House Only) 0%
2011-2012 Americans for Better Immigration - Positions 64%
2011-2012 The American Hellenic Educational Progressive Association - Positions 0%
2011-2012 The Public Affairs Alliance of Iranian Americans - Positions 17%
2011 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 0%
2009-2010 American Immigration Lawyers Association - U.S. House Score 50%
2009-2010 Federation for American Immigration Reform - Positions 100%
2009-2010 The American Hellenic Educational Progressive Association - Positions 26%
2009-2010 United States English - U.S. House Score 92%
2007-2010 National Latino Congreso/William C. Velásquez Institute - Positions 0%
2007-2008 English First - Positions on English as the Official Language A
2007-2008 Federation for American Immigration Reform - Positions 69%
2007-2008 The American Hellenic Educational Progressive Association - Greek American Issues Score 39%
2007-2008 United States English - Positions on English as the Official Language A
2007 English First - Positions 100%
2007 National Council of Agricultural Employers - Positions 0%
2007 National Council of La Raza - Positions 0
2006 American Immigration Lawyers Association - Positions 0%
2006 English First - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Americans for Better Immigration - Positions 53%
2005-2006 Iranian American Political Action Committee - Positions 33%
2005-2006 United States Border Control - Positions 92%
2005 American Immigration Lawyers Association - Positions 0%
2005 Americans for Immigration Control - Positions 50%
2005 Federation for American Immigration Reform - Positions 71%
2005 National Council of Agricultural Employers - Positions 66%
2005 National Council of La Raza - Positions 33%
2004 Federation for American Immigration Reform - Positions 75%
2004 National Council of La Raza - Positions 100%
2003-2006 Americans for Better Immigration - Positions 62%
2003-2005 Americans for Better Immigration - Positions 69%
2003-2004 National Hispanic Leadership Agenda - Positions 22%
2003-2004 United States Border Control - Positions 60%
2003 Federation for American Immigration Reform - Positions 0%
1995-2004 American Immigration Lawyers Association - Positions 14%
1989-2013 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Reduce Illegal Immigration at the Border - Career (Feb 11, 2013) %
1989-2013 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Reduce Visa Lottery - Career (Feb 11, 2013) %
1989-2013 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Reduce Illegal Jobs and Presence - Career (Feb 11, 2013) %
1989-2013 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Reduce Illegal Immigration Rewards - Career (Feb 11, 2013) %
1989-2013 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Reduce Chain Migration - Career (Feb 11, 2013) %
1989-2013 NumbersUSA [Americans for Better Immigration] - Reduce Anchor Baby Citizenship - Career (Feb 11, 2013) %

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top