Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Michael 'Mike' R. Turner's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Environment

Office: U.S. House (OH) - District 10, Republican

Environment

2014 Environment America - Positions 0%
2014 Food Policy Action - Positions 22%
2014 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 9%
2013-2014 Food Policy Action - Positions 22%
2013-2014 League of Conservation Voters - Positions (113th Congress, full session) 5%
2013 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 17%
2013 EarthRights International - Positions 13%
2013 Environment America - Positions 0%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 31%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 10%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 7%
2012 EarthRights International - Corporate Accountability Coalition Positions 22%
2012 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 6%
2012 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 11%
2012 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean water (House Only) 7%
2011-2012 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 6%
2011-2012 Environment America - Positions 0%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 43%
2011-2012 League of Conservation Voters - Session Score 9%
2011-2012 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions (House Only) 29%
2011 Environment America - Positions 12%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 12%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 11%
2011 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean Water (House Only) 8%
2011 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and WILL - Positions (House Only) 0
2010-2011 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 10%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 10%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 12%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 43%
2009-2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 29%
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 78
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 60%
2009 Environment America - Positions 53%
2009 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 43%
2008 Environment America - Positions 23%
2007-2008 ConservAmerica - Positions 20
2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 13%
2007-2008 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 15%
2007 American Society of Landscape Architects - Positions 66
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 13
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2007 League of Conservation Voters - First Session Score 10%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 71%
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 17
2006 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 8%
2006 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and WILL - Positions 0%
2005-2006 American Forest and Paper Association - Positions 100%
2005-2006 American Lands Alliance - Positions 0%
2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2005-2006 Partnership for America - Positions 93%
2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 8
2005 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 6%
2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 0%
2004 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2003-2004 American Lands Alliance - Positions 0%
2003-2004 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2003-2004 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2003-2004 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 17%
2003-2004 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and WILL - Positions 7%
2003 American Lands Alliance - Positions 0%
2003 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 7%
2003 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2003 Sierra Club - Positions 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top