Jean Schmidt
Jean Schmidt's Special Interest Group Ratings
Filter by Issue:
- down
- Abortion
- Abortion and Reproductive
- Agriculture and Food
- Animals and Wildlife
- Arts and Entertainment
- Budget, Spending and Taxes
- Business and Consumers
- Campaign Finance and Elections
- Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
- Conservative
- Crime
- Death Penalty
- Defense
- Drugs
- Education
- Employment and Affirmative Action
- Energy
- Environment
- Executive Branch
- Federal, State and Local Relations
- Foreign Affairs
- Gambling and Gaming
- Government Operations
- Guns
- Health and Health Care
- Housing and Property
- Immigration
- Indigenous Peoples
- Judicial Branch
- Labor Unions
- Legislative Branch
- Liberal
- Marriage, Family, and Children
- Military Personnel
- National Security
- Science
- Senior Citizens
- Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
- Social
- Stem Cell Research
- Technology and Communication
- Trade
- Transportation
- Unemployed and Low-Income
- Veterans
- Women
Abortion
Agriculture and Food
| 2011 | American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions | 88% |
| 2009-2010 | American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions | 66% |
| 2009-2010 | National Farmers Union - Positions | 0% |
| 2008 | National Association of Wheat Growers - Positions | 11% |
| 2007-2008 | American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions | 41% |
| 2007-2008 | National Farmers Union - Family Farm Advocacy Score | 14 |
| 2007 | National Association of Wheat Growers - Positions | 24% |
| 2007 | National Council of Agricultural Employers - Positions | 0% |
| 2007 | United Fresh Produce Association - Positions | 0% |
| 2005-2006 | American Farm Bureau Federation - Positions | 58% |
| 2005 | National Council of Agricultural Employers - Positions | 0% |
| 2001 | Ohio Farm Bureau Federation - Positions | 100% |
Animals and Wildlife
Arts and Entertainment
| 2012 | TechCrunch/CrunchGov - Positions on Technology Industry | 50% |
| 2011 | Americans for the Arts Action Fund - Positions (House Only) | 100% |
| 2008 | Americans for the Arts Action Fund - Positions | 40% |
Budget, Spending and Taxes
Business and Consumers
Campaign Finance and Elections
| 2008-2011 | Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby | 100% |
| 2007 | League of Women Voters - Campaign Finance and Election Issues Score | 50% |
Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
Conservative
Drugs
Education
Employment and Affirmative Action
| 2009 | Women Employed - Positions | 0% |
| 2008 | Latin America Working Group - Positions | 0% |
| 2007 | National Employment Lawyers Association - Positions | 33% |
Energy
Environment
Federal, State and Local Relations
| 2009 | The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions | 100% |
Foreign Affairs
Government Operations
Guns
Health and Health Care
Immigration
| 2009-2010 | American Immigration Lawyers Association - U.S. House Score | 0% |
| 2009-2010 | Federation for American Immigration Reform - Positions | 100% |
| 2009-2010 | United States English - U.S. House Score | 100% |
| 2007-2010 | National Latino Congreso/William C. Velásquez Institute - Positions | 0% |
| 2007-2008 | Federation for American Immigration Reform - Positions | 100% |
| 2007 | English First - Positions | 100% |
| 2006 | American Immigration Lawyers Association - Positions | 0% |
| 2006 | English First - Positions | 100% |
| 2005-2006 | Americans for Better Immigration - Positions | 89% |
| 2005-2006 | United States Border Control - Positions | 100% |
| 2005 | Americans for Immigration Control - Positions | 100% |
| 2003-2006 | Americans for Better Immigration - Positions | 100% |
Labor Unions
Legislative Branch
| 2008-2011 | Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby | 100% |
| 2007-2008 | Grassroots Netroots Alliance - Positions | 23% |
Liberal
Marriage, Family, and Children
| 2011 | The Children's Health Fund - Positions (House Only) | 0% |
| 2010 | Vote Kids - Positions | 23% |
| 2009-2010 | American Family Association - Positions | 100% |
| 2009-2010 | Children's Defense Fund - Positions | 10% |
| 2009-2010 | School Nutrition Association - Positions (House Only) | 0% |
| 2009 | The Children's Health Fund - Positions | 0% |
| 2009 | Vote Kids - Positions | 23% |
| 2007-2008 | American Family Association - Positions | 100% |
| 2007-2008 | Family Research Council - Positions | 100% |
| 2007-2008 | The Arc - Positions | 0% |
| 2007 | American Academy of Family Physicians - Positions | 0% |
| 2007 | Children's Defense Fund - Positions | 30% |
| 2007 | Family Research Council - Positions | 100 |
| 2007 | League of Women Voters - Children's Health Issues Score | 0% |
| 2006 | Children's Defense Fund - Positions | 20% |
| 2006 | Family Research Council - Positions | 85% |
| 2005-2006 | American Family Association - Positions | 100% |
| 2005-2006 | The Arc - Positions | 40% |
| 2005 | Children's Defense Fund - Positions | 0% |
| 2005 | Family Research Council - Positions | 100% |
Military Personnel
National Security
| 2010 | American Security Council Foundation - Positions | 100% |
| 2009 | American Security Council Foundation - Positions | 100% |
| 2007-2008 | ACT! for America - Positions | 100% |
| 2007-2008 | American Security Council Foundation - Positions | 100% |
| 2007-2008 | Center for Security Policy - Positions | 96% |
| 2005-2006 | ACT! for America - Positions | 41% |
| 2005-2006 | Center for Security Policy - Positions | 100% |
| 2001-2010 | Keep America Safe - Positions | 100% |
Senior Citizens
Social
Technology and Communication
| 2012 | TechCrunch/CrunchGov - Positions on Technology Industry | 50% |
| 2008 | CNET News - Positions | 38% |
| 2007-2008 | Information Technology Industry Council - Positions | 71% |
| 2007 | AeA - Positions | 75% |
| 2007 | Computer & Communications Industry Association - Positions | 43% |
| 2006 | CNET News - Positions | 0% |
| 2005-2006 | Computer & Communications Industry Association - Positions | 0% |
| 2005-2006 | Information Technology Industry Council - Positions | 100% |
Trade
| 2009-2010 | International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions | 100% |
| 2009-2010 | USA Engage - Positions | 60% |
| 2008 | The Alliance for Worker Freedom - Positions | 67% |
| 2007-2008 | International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions | 100% |
| 2007-2008 | National Foreign Trade Council - Positions | 33% |
| 2007 | Associated Equipment Distributors - Positions | 71% |
| 2007 | The Alliance for Worker Freedom - Positions | 54% |
Unemployed and Low-Income
Veterans
| 2011 | Vietnam Veterans of America - Positions | 100% |
| 2009 | Disabled American Veterans - House of Representatives Score | 100% |
| 2006 | Disabled American Veterans - Positions | 66% |
Women
| 2011 | Federally Employed Women - Positions | 33% |
| 2010 | Federally Employed Women - Positions | 40% |
| 2009 | Federally Employed Women - Positions | 30% |
| 2009 | Women Employed - Positions | 0% |
| 2007-2008 | Federally Employed Women - Equality in Government Score | 50 |
| 2007-2008 | National Organization for Women - Positions | 25% |
| 2007 | Federally Employed Women - Positions | 30% |
| 2006 | United States Women's Chamber of Commerce - Positions | 0% |
| 2005-2006 | Federally Employed Women - Positions | 30% |
| 2005-2006 | National Organization for Women - Positions | 7% |
| 2005 | National Organization for Women - Positions | 33% |
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
