or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Timothy 'Tim' H. Bishop

Timothy 'Tim' H. Bishop's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Foreign Affairs

Full Name: Timothy 'Tim' H. Bishop
Current Office: U.S. House - District 1, Democratic
First Elected: 11/2002
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014

Foreign Affairs

2013 Bread for the World - Positions 90%
2013 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 71%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 18%
2013 Peace Action West - Positions (Nov. 20, 2013) 72%
2012 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 30%
2012 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 9%
2012 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions 54%
2012 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
2012 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 75%
2012 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 47%
2012 National Journal - House Liberal (Foreign) 73%
2012 Peace Action - Positions 62%
2011-2012 ACT! for America - Positions 42%
2011-2012 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 67%
2011-2012 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 56%
2011-2012 USA Engage - Positions 38%
2011 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 25%
2011 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 64%
2011 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 72%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 27%
2011 Peace Action West - Positions 43%
2010 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 30%
2010 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 63%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 37%
2010 Peace Action - Positions 50%
2010 Peace Action West - Positions 50%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 50%
2009-2010 Council for a Livable World - Positions 100%
2009-2010 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 100%
2009-2010 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -4%
2009-2010 USA Engage - Positions 40%
2009-2010 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 30%
2009 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 50%
2009 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 42%
2009 Latin America Working Group - Positions 25%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 31%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 67%
2009 NewPolicy.org - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy 0%
2009 Peace Action West - Positions 54%
2009 Resolve Uganda - Lifetime Score 25%
2009 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -1%
2008 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions on Armenian American Issues B-
2008 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A
2008 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 100%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 15%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 83%
2008 Peace Action West - Positions 80%
2008 Resolve Uganda - Lifetime Score D
2007-2009 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 17%
2007-2008 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 33%
2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 87%
2007-2008 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 50%
2007-2008 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 77%
2007-2008 Population Action International - Positions 100%
2007-2008 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -3
2007-2008 USA Engage - Positions on Trade and Engagement B
2007-2008 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions +1
2007 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A
2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 100%
2007 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 100%
2007 Latin America Working Group - Positions 40%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 86%
2007 Peace Action West - Positions 100%
2007 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2007 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur B
2007 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Iraq-Afghanistan Supplemental Spending Score 83%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 14%
2006 Church World Service - Positions 33
2006 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A
2006 Latin America Working Group - Positions 50%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 17%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 82%
2006 Peace Action - Positions 77%
2006 Peace Action West - Positions 77%
2006 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur B
2006 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 25%
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 35%
2005-2006 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 100%
2005-2006 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 33%
2005-2006 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 66%
2005-2006 Population Action International - Positions on Reproductive Health 100%
2005-2006 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -10
2005 Church World Service - Positions 100
2005 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A+
2005 Council on American-Islamic Relations - Positions 100%
2005 Latin America Working Group - Positions 75%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 33%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 67%
2005 Peace Action - Positions 58%
2005 PeacePAC - Positions 75%
2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 100%
2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
2004 Latin America Working Group - Positions 43%
2004 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 62%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 36%
2004 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 67%
2004 Peace Action - Positions 80%
2003-2004 ACT! for America - Positions 87.5%
2003-2004 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -6
2003-2004 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 60%
2003-2004 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 87%
2003-2004 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 33%
2003-2004 PeacePAC - Positions 82%
2003-2004 Population Action International - Positions 100%
2003-2004 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -4
2003-2004 USA Engage - Positions 40%
2003-2004 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 50%
2003 Bread for the World - Positions 100%
2003 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 78%
2003 Latin America Working Group - Positions 44%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 21%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 75%
2003 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0%
2003 Peace Action - Positions 100%
2003 Population Action International - Positions 100%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2002-2003 Citizens for Global Solutions - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top