or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Timothy 'Tim' H. Bishop

Representative Timothy 'Tim' H. Bishop's Special Interest Group Ratings

Timothy 'Tim' H. Bishop
Full Name: Timothy 'Tim' H. Bishop
Current Office: U.S. House - District 1, Democratic
First Elected: 11/2002
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014

Conservative

2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 3%
2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 8%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 8%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 2%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 0%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 14%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 23%
2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 10%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 24%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 27%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 72%
2011 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 74%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 26%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 76%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 27%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 73%
2011 The Club for Growth - Positions 0%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 20%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 15%
2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 15%
2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 3%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 0%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 23%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 27%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 37%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 20%
2010 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 73%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 63%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 76%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 78%
2010 The Club for Growth - Positions 0%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 0%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 0%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 0%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 3%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 0%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 5%
2009 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 70%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 30%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 34%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 20%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 31%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 21%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 7%
2009 The Club for Growth - Positions 4%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 0%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 0%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 0%
2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 0%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 30%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 22.8%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 15%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 25%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 25%
2008 The Club for Growth - Positions 4%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 5%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 5
2007-2008 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 10%
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 22%
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 15%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 0%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0%
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 5%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 0%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 18%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 11%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 17%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 17.5%
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 18%
2007 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 41%
2007 The Club for Growth - Positions 0%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 30%
2007 Traditional Values Coalition - Positions 0
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 16%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0%
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 16.5%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 17%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 0%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 29%
2006 The Club for Growth - Positions 10%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 27%
2006 Traditional Values Coalition - Positions 14%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 17%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 23%
2005-2006 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Conservative Action Score 0%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 0%
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 20%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 33%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 9%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 30%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 20%
2005 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 40%
2005 The John Birch Society - Positions 13%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 4%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 16%
2004 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 16%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 24%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 27%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 36%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 29%
2004 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 30%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring) 25%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 10%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 7%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 23%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 16%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 9%
2003 Center for Reclaiming America - Positions 50%
2003 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 16%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 23%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 8%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 23%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 21%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 21%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 24%
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 5
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 5
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 5
2003 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer) 25%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top