Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Leonard Lance's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Environment

Office: U.S. House (NJ) - District 7, Republican
On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House - District 7

Environment

2014 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 25%
2013 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 67%
2013 Environment America - Positions 16%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 62%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 21%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 31%
2012 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 34%
2012 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 17%
2012 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean water (House Only) 43%
2011-2012 Clean Water Action - Positions 8%
2011-2012 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 28%
2011-2012 Environment America - Positions 11%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 50%
2011-2012 League of Conservation Voters - Session Score 26%
2011-2012 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions (House Only) 43%
2011 Environment America - Positions 39%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 34%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 44%
2011 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean Water (House Only) 50%
2011 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions (House Only) 8
2010-2011 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 40%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 40%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 58%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 57%
2009-2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 58%
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 103
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 80%
2009 Environment America - Positions 67%
2009 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 71%
2008 Environment New Jersey - Positions 88%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top