or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Paul D. Tonko

Representative Paul D. Tonko's Special Interest Group Ratings

Paul D. Tonko
Full Name: Paul D. Tonko
Current Office: U.S. House - District 20, Democratic
First Elected: 11/04/2008
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014

Business and Consumers

2012 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions 50%
2012 TechCrunch/CrunchGov - Positions on Technology Industry 75%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 80%
2011 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions (House Only) 100%
2011 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 0%
2011 National Retail Federation - Positions 0%
2011 National Small Business Association - Positions 33%
2011 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 25%
2011 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 0%
2011 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 19%
2010 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 25%
2010 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 0%
2009-2010 American Council of Engineering Companies - Positions 89%
2009-2010 Associated General Contractors of America - Positions 37%
2009-2010 International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions 20%
2009-2010 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 33%
2009-2010 National Retail Federation - Positions 0%
2009-2010 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 55%
2009-2010 Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council - Positions 0%
2009 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 33%
2006 Business Council of New York State, Incorporated - Positions C
2006 New York National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 36%
2003-2004 New York National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 50%
2001-2002 New York National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 42%
1999-2000 New York National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 70%
1997-1998 New York National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 67%
1996 New York National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 62%

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

2012 Open Doors USA - Positions 50%
2011-2012 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 80%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 70%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 11%
2011 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions (House Only) 100%
2009-2010 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 88%
2009-2010 Arab American Institute - Positions 15%
2009-2010 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 56%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 11
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 73%
2009-2010 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 100%
2009-2010 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 95%
2009 American Library Association - Positions 38%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 10%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 55%
2009 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 96%
2000 Empire State Pride Agenda - Positions 100%
1998 Empire State Pride Agenda - Positions 80%
1997 New York Civil Liberties Union - Positions 89%
1997 New York Civil Liberties Union - Positions 89%
1996 New York Civil Liberties Union - Positions 60%

Conservative

2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 0%
2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 1%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 14%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 1%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 4%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 3%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 23%
2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 0%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 88%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 20%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 8%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 7%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 80%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 92%
2011 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 93%
2011 The Club for Growth - Positions 11%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 20%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 20%
2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 20%
2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 0%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 0%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 73%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 0%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 71%
2010 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 81%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 24%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 90%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 25%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 19%
2010 The Club for Growth - Positions 0%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 10%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 0%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 5%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 0%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 0%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 5%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 11%
2009 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 84%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 14%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 16%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 17%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 7%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 14%
2009 The Club for Growth - Positions 0%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 5%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 0%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 10%
2006 Conservative Party of New York State - Positions 36%
2005 Conservative Party of New York State - Positions 24%
2004 Conservative Party of New York State - Positions 15%
2003 Conservative Party of New York State - Positions 18%
1998 Christian Coalition of New York - Positions 50%
1998 Conservative Union - Positions 50%

Employment and Affirmative Action

2009 Women Employed - Positions 50%

Labor Unions

2011-2012 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 100%
2011 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 100%
2011 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 100%
2011 Federally Employed Women - Positions 100%
2011 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 71%
2010 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 100%
2010 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 100%
2010 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 100%
2010 Federally Employed Women - Positions 60%
2010 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 100%
2010 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - House of Representatives Score 100%
2009-2010 Communications Workers of America - Positions 100%
2009-2010 International Brotherhood of Teamsters - Positions 100%
2009-2010 International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions 0%
2009-2010 National Association for the Self-Employed - U.S. House Score 100%
2009-2010 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2009 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 100%
2009 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 100%
2009 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Lifetime Score 100%
2009 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 100%
2009 Federally Employed Women - Positions 90%
2009 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 100%
2009 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 100%
2009 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2009 Women Employed - Positions 50%
2003-2004 Public Employees Federation - Positions 100%
2001-2002 New York AFL-CIO - Positions 90%
1999-2000 New York AFL-CIO - Positions 100%

Liberal

2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 11%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 80%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 70%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 88%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 8%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 20%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 92%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 7%
2011 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 93%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 80%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2010 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 73%
2010 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 81%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 0%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 71%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 90%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 25%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 24%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 19%
2009 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 84%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 16%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 82%
2009 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 84%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 78%
2006 New York City Americans for Democratic Action - Liberal Issues Score 90
1996 New York City Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 73%
1995 New York City Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

2009-2010 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top