or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Jon Stevens Corzine

Jon Stevens Corzine's Ratings and Endorsements

Full Name: Jon Stevens Corzine

Business and Consumers

2004 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 58%
2004 Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council - Positions 20%
2004 State PIRGs Working Together - Positions 95%
2004 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 47%
2004 United States Public Interest Research Group - Positions 95%
2003-2004 American Forest and Paper Association - Positions 25%
2003-2004 Associated Builders & Contractors - Positions 10%
2003-2004 Business-Industry Political Action Committee - Positions 4%
2003-2004 National Association for the Self-Employed - Positions 100%
2003-2004 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 9%
2003-2004 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions 33%
2003-2004 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 0%
2003-2004 National Restaurant Association - Positions 14%
2003-2004 National Retail Federation - Positions 12%
2003-2004 National Small Business Association - Positions 0%
2003-2004 Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors-National Association - Positions 33%
2003-2004 Public Citizen's Congress Watch - Positions 76%
2003 Associated Builders & Contractors - Positions 0%
2003 Business-Industry Political Action Committee - Positions 4%
2003 Maryland Business for Responsive Government - Positions 8%
2003 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 0%
2003 National Retail Federation - Positions 12%
2003 Public Citizen's Congress Watch - Positions 82%
2003 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 27%
2003 United States Public Interest Research Group - Positions 95%
2002 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 36%
2002 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 50%
2002 United States Public Interest Research Group - Positions 85%
2001-2002 Associated Builders & Contractors - Positions 22%
2001-2002 Business-Industry Political Action Committee - Positions 0%
2001-2002 National Association for the Self-Employed - Positions 0%
2001-2002 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 0%
2001-2002 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions 38%
2001-2002 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 25%
2001-2002 Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors-National Association - Positions 0%
2001-2002 Public Citizen's Congress Watch - Positions 96%
2001-2002 Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council - Positions 0%
2001 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 17%
2001 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 40%
2001 Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council - Positions 0%
2001 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 36%
1999-2004 National Ready Mixed Concrete Association - Positions 20%

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

2004 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
2003-2004 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 62%
2003-2004 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 100%
2003-2004 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 100%
2003-2004 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 97%
2003-2004 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -5
2003 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 90%
2003 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 100%
2003 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 96%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -1
2001-2002 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 60%
2001-2002 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 100%
2001-2002 Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights - Positions 100%
2001-2002 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 88%
2001-2002 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 100%
2001-2002 People for the American Way - Positions 92%
2001 American Civil Liberties Union - Positions 50%
2001 Common Cause - Positions 100%
2001 Human Rights Campaign - Positions 100%
2001 League of United Latin American Citizens - Positions 91%
2001 National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) - Positions 100%

Federal, State and Local Relations

2001-2002 National Association of Counties - Positions 89%

Fiscally Conservative

2004 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 30%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 13%
2004 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 19%
2004 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 18%
2003-2008 The Cato Institute - Revenue Score 33%
2003-2008 The Cato Institute - Overall Fiscal Policy Score 32%
2003-2008 The Cato Institute - Spending Score 27%
2003-2008 The Cato Institute - Tax Rate Score 34%
2003-2004 FreedomWorks - Positions 7%
2003-2004 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 10%
2003-2004 The Cato Institute - Trade Subsidy Votes Score 100%
2003 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 0%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 26%
2003 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 17%
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 25
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 25
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 25
2002 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 5%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 20%
2002 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 20%
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 22
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 22
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 22
2001-2002 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 0%
2001-2002 The Cato Institute - Trade Barrier Votes Score 13%
2001-2002 The Cato Institute - Trade Subsidy Votes Score 100%
2001 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 10%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 0%
2001 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 9%
2001 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 10%

Foreign Affairs

2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 8%
2005 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score A+
2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
2004 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 93%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 5%
2004 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 100%
2004 Peace Action - Positions 100%
2003-2004 ACT! for America - Positions 50%
2003-2004 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -3
2003-2004 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 10%
2003-2004 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -5
2003-2004 USA Engage - Positions 20%
2003-2004 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 43%
2003 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 89%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 86%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 10%
2003 Peace Action - Positions 100%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -1
2002-2003 Citizens for Global Solutions - Positions 85%
2002 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 50%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 6%
2002 Peace Action - Positions 60%
2001-2004 Council for a Livable World - Positions 100%
2001-2002 American Foreign Service Association - Positions 81%
2001-2002 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -9
2001-2002 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 75%
2001-2002 USA Engage - Positions 20%
2001 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 92%
2001 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 87%
2001 Peace Action - Positions 43%
2001 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 0%
1998-2002 Center for Security Policy - Positions 33%

Impartial/Nonpartisan

2001 Common Cause - Positions 100%

Labor Unions

2005 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 100%
2005 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2004 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 100%
2004 American Postal Workers Union - Positions 100%
2004 Communications Workers of America - Positions 100%
2004 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 100%
2004 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2004 Transportation Communications Union - Positions 100%
2004 United Auto Workers - Positions 91%
2004 United Electrical Radio and Machine Workers - Positions 84%
2003-2004 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers - Positions 62%
2003-2004 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers - Positions 93%
2003-2004 National Farmers Union - Positions 44%
2003 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 100%
2003 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 100%
2003 Communications Workers of America - Positions 100%
2003 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 83%
2003 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 86%
2003 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers - Positions 91%
2003 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2003 Transportation Communications Union - Positions 100%
2003 United Auto Workers - Positions on Workplace Rights 92%
2003 United Electrical Radio and Machine Workers - Positions 84%
2002 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 100%
2002 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 100%
2002 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 100%
2002 Communications Workers of America - Positions 100%
2002 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 100%
2002 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 50%
2002 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2002 Transportation Communications Union - Positions 100%
2002 United Auto Workers - Positions 102%
2002 United Electrical Radio and Machine Workers - Positions 86%
2001-2002 American Postal Workers Union - Positions 100%
2001-2002 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers - Positions 91%
2001-2002 National Farmers Union - Positions 90%
2001 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 93%
2001 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 100%
2001 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 100%
2001 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 100%
2001 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 100%
2001 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2001 Transportation Communications Union - Positions 100%
2001 United Auto Workers - Positions 100%
2001 United Electrical Radio and Machine Workers - Positions 86%
2001 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 100%
1999 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 100%

Socially Conservative

2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 33%
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 33%
2004 American Family Association - Positions 0%
2004 American Family Association - Positions 0%
2004 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 0%
2004 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 0%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 20%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 20%
2004 Family Research Council - Positions 0%
2004 Family Research Council - Positions 0%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 0%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 0%
2004 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 18%
2004 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 18%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 20%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 20%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 3%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 3%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 7%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 7%
2003-2004 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 0%
2003-2004 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 0%
2003 American Family Association - Positions 0%
2003 American Family Association - Positions 0%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 3%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 3%
2003 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 0%
2003 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 0%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 13%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 13%
2003 Family Research Council - Positions 14%
2003 Family Research Council - Positions 14%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 0%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 0%
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 25
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 25
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 25
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 25
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 25
2003 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 25
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 25%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 25%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 0%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 0%
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 22
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 22
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 22
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 22
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 22
2002 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Conservative Issues 22
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 20%
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 20%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 25%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 25%
2001-2002 Family Research Council - Positions 11%
2001-2002 Family Research Council - Positions 11%
2001-2002 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 0%
2001-2002 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 0%
2001 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 0%
2001 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 0%
2001 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 10%
2001 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions 10%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 5%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 5%

Socially Liberal

2005 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100%
2005 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100%
2004 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
2004 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
2004 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2004 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2004 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 82%
2004 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 82%
2004 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 86%
2004 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 86%
2003 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 90%
2003 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 90%
2003 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2003 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2003 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 95%
2003 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 95%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 85%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 85%
2003 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 80%
2003 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 80%
2002 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
2002 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
2002 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 82%
2002 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 82%
2002 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100%
2002 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100%
2001-2002 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 95%
2001-2002 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 95%
2001-2002 People for the American Way - Positions 92%
2001-2002 People for the American Way - Positions 92%
2001 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
2001 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
2001 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2001 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2001 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 98%
2001 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 98%
2001 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 95%
2001 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 95%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top