Representative Frank C. Guinta's Special Interest Group Ratings

Office: Elected to U.S. House (NH) - District 1, Republican
View 2014 Endorsements
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

Socially Conservative

2012 Catholic Advocate - Positions 100% 2012 Catholic Advocate - Positions 100% 2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100% 2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100% 2012 Family Research Council - Positions 66% 2012 Family Research Council - Positions 66% 2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Social) 83% 2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Social) 83% 2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 73% 2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 73% 2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100% 2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100% 2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 68% 2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 68% 2011-2012 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100% 2011-2012 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100% 2011 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100% 2011 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100% 2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 61% 2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 61% 2011 Family Research Council - Positions 90% 2011 Family Research Council - Positions 90% 2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 76% 2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 76% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 83% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 83% 2011 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100% 2011 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 90% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 90% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 85% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 85%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.