Representative Frank Guinta's Special Interest Group Ratings

Office: U.S. House (NH) - District 1, Republican
On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House - District 1
Richard Ashooh

(Running)

Republican

Michael Callis

(Running)

Republican

Jamieson Gradert

(Running)

Republican

Robert Risley

(Running)

Republican

Carol Shea-Porter

(Running)

Democratic

View 2016 Endorsements
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Business and Consumers

2015-2016 Associated Builders & Contractors - Positions 100% 2015-2016 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100 2015 Associated General Contractors of America - Positions (Lifetime) 94% 2015 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 95% 2015 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 75% 2015 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions (Cumulative) 92% 2014 Gun Owners of America - Positions 90% 2012 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions of 112th Congress 97% 2012 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions 66% 2012 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100% 2012 United States Chamber of Commerce - Lifetime Score 100% 2011-2012 American Council of Engineering Companies - Positions 82 2011-2012 Associated Builders & Contractors - Positions 100% 2011-2012 Independent Electrical Contractors - Positions (House) 75% 2011-2012 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 96% 2011-2012 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100% 2011-2012 National Retail Federation - Positions: International Trade 100% 2011-2012 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 100% 2011-2012 Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors Association - Positions 100% 2011-2012 Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council - Positions 100% 2011 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions (House Only) 100% 2011 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100% 2011 National Retail Federation - Positions 100% 2011 National Small Business Association - Positions 66% 2011 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 100% 2011 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 100% 2011 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100%

Labor Unions

2015 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 12% 2015 International Brotherhood of Teamsters - Positions 15% 2015 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 0% 2013 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 100% 2012 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 0 2012 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Lifetime Score 6% 2012 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 17% 2012 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Lifetime Score 0% 2012 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 0% 2012 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 11% 2012 National Farmers Union - Positions 11% 2012 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 0% 2011-2012 American Federation of Teachers - Positions 0% 2011-2012 International Brotherhood of Teamsters - Positions 0% 2011-2012 International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions (House) 100% 2011-2012 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 0% 2011 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 0% 2011 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 0% 2011 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Lifetime Score 0% 2011 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 0% 2011 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 0%

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

Socially Conservative

2015 The John Birch Society - Positions 70 2015 The John Birch Society - Positions 70 2014 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 0% 2014 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 0% 2012 Catholic Advocate - Positions 100% 2012 Catholic Advocate - Positions 100% 2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100% 2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100% 2012 Family Research Council - Positions 66% 2012 Family Research Council - Positions 66% 2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Social) 83% 2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Social) 83% 2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 73% 2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 73% 2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100% 2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100% 2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 68% 2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 68% 2011-2012 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100% 2011-2012 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100% 2011 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100% 2011 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100% 2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 61% 2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 61% 2011 Family Research Council - Positions 90% 2011 Family Research Council - Positions 90% 2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 76% 2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 76% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 83% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 83% 2011 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100% 2011 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 85% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 85% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 90% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 90%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.