Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Kelly A. Ayotte's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Environment

Office: U.S. Senate (NH) - Jr, Republican

Environment

2015 League of Conservation Voters - Senate Special Edition 50%
2014 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 0%
2014 Environment America - Positions 0%
2014 Food Policy Action - Positions 17%
2014 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 23%
2013-2014 American Forest and Paper Association - Positions 100%
2013-2014 Clean Water Action - Positions 38%
2013-2014 Food Policy Action - Positions 17%
2013-2014 League of Conservation Voters - Positions (113th Congress, full session) 22%
2013 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2013 EarthRights International - Positions 0%
2013 Environment America - Positions 57%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 17%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 26%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 31%
2012 EarthRights International - Corporate Accountability Coalition Positions 25%
2012 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 29%
2012 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 24%
2011-2012 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2011-2012 Environment America - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 33%
2011-2012 League of Conservation Voters - Session Score 24%
2011 Environment America - Positions 45%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 18%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 18%
2010-2011 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top