Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

John A. Graham's Ratings and Endorsements

Fiscally Conservative

2014 Americans for Prosperity Foundation - New Hampshire - Positions 71%
2014 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions (House) 72%
2013 Americans for Prosperity Foundation - New Hampshire - Positions 92%
2013 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions (House) 80%
2012 Americans for Prosperity Foundation - New Hampshire - Positions 90%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity Foundation - New Hampshire - Cumulative Rating 80%
2011-2012 Cornerstone Policy Research - Positions 57
2011-2012 Cornerstone Policy Research - Family Score 50
2011-2012 Cornerstone Policy Research - Constitutional Score 50
2011-2012 Cornerstone Policy Research - Fiscal Score 91
2011-2012 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Interim Score (House Only) 78
2011-2012 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions (House Only) 65
2011-2012 Republican Liberty Caucus of New Hampshire - Positions 59%
2011 Americans for Prosperity Foundation - New Hampshire - Positions 91%
2010 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions 74%
2009 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions 78%
2007-2008 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions 68
2007 Cornerstone Policy Research - Positions 50%
2007 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions on Republican Principles 73
2006 Cornerstone Policy Research - Positions 45%
2005-2006 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions 55%
2004 Cornerstone Policy Research - Positions 20%

Socially Conservative

2014 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions (House) 72%
2014 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions (House) 72%
2013 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions (House) 80%
2013 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions (House) 80%
2011-2012 Cornerstone Policy Research - Fiscal Score 91
2011-2012 Cornerstone Policy Research - Fiscal Score 91
2011-2012 Cornerstone Policy Research - Positions 57
2011-2012 Cornerstone Policy Research - Life Score 17
2011-2012 Cornerstone Policy Research - Positions 57
2011-2012 Cornerstone Policy Research - Constitutional Score 50
2011-2012 Cornerstone Policy Research - Constitutional Score 50
2011-2012 Cornerstone Policy Research - Life Score 17
2011-2012 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions (House Only) 65
2011-2012 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Interim Score (House Only) 78
2011-2012 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Interim Score (House Only) 78
2011-2012 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions (House Only) 65
2011-2012 Republican Liberty Caucus of New Hampshire - Positions 59%
2011-2012 Republican Liberty Caucus of New Hampshire - Positions 59%
2010 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions 74%
2010 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions 74%
2009 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions 78%
2009 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions 78%
2007-2008 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions 68
2007-2008 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions 68
2007 Cornerstone Policy Research - Positions 50%
2007 Cornerstone Policy Research - Positions 50%
2007 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions on Republican Principles 73
2007 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions on Republican Principles 73
2006 Cornerstone Policy Research - Positions 45%
2006 Cornerstone Policy Research - Positions 45%
2005-2006 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions 55%
2005-2006 New Hampshire House Republican Alliance - Positions 55%
2004 Cornerstone Policy Research - Positions 20%
2004 Cornerstone Policy Research - Positions 20%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top