Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Jeff Fortenberry's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Animals and Wildlife

Office: U.S. House (NE) - District 1, Republican
On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House - District 1

Animals and Wildlife

2015 American Veterinary Medical Association - Positions on Professional Advocacy 100%
2015 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 17%
2015 Food Policy Action - Positions 42%
2015 Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 11%
2014 Food Policy Action - Positions 33%
2014 Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance - Positions 85%
2013-2014 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 22%
2013-2014 Food Policy Action - Positions 33%
2013-2014 Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 8%
2013 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 33%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 38%
2012 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean water (House Only) 0%
2012 Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 17%
2011-2012 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 29%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 50%
2011 American Veterinary Medical Association - Positions on Professional Advocacy 100%
2011 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean Water (House Only) 8%
2010-2011 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 32%
2010 Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance - Positions 50%
2009-2010 Animal Welfare Institute - U.S. House Score 50%
2009-2010 Big Cat Rescue - House of Representatives Score 66%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 43%
2009-2010 Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 47%
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 40%
2008 Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance - Positions 25
2007-2008 Animal Welfare Institute - U.S. House Score 0%
2007-2008 Big Cat Rescue - Positions 66
2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 50%
2007-2008 Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 42%
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 40%
2007 Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions on Animal Protection 17%
2006 National Animal Interest Alliance Trust - Positions 100%
2006 Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance - Positions 100%
2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 16%
2005-2006 Animal Welfare Institute - U.S. House Score 0%
2005-2006 Big Cat Rescue - Positions 38%
2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 6%
2005-2006 Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 28%
2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2005 Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 0%
2004 Sportsmen's and Animal Owners' Voting Alliance - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top