Senator John H. Hoeven's Special Interest Group Ratings

Biographical

Full Name: John H. Hoeven
Current Office: U.S. Senate - Sr, Republican
First Elected: 11/02/2010
Last Elected: 11/02/2010
Next Election: 2016
Gender: Male
Family: Wife: Mical; 2 Children: Marcela, Jack
Birth Date: 03/13/1957
Birth Place: Bismarck, ND
Home City: Minot, ND
Religion: Catholic
View 2010 Endorsements
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Business and Consumers

2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores 94% 2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Infrastructure) 83% 2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Taxes) 100% 2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Labor) 100% 2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Environment) 100% 2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Positions 85% 2013-2014 Associated General Contractors of America - Lifetime Scores (Other) 100% 2013-2014 International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions 100% 2013-2014 National Retail Federation - Positions: Labor 100% 2013-2014 National Retail Federation - Positions: Budget/Tax 50% 2013-2014 National Retail Federation - Positions: Other (Senate Only) 100% 2013-2014 National Small Business Association - Positions 50 2013-2014 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 100 2013 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions 90% 2013 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100% 2013 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 100% 2013 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 88% 2013 United States Chamber of Commerce - Lifetime Score 96% 2012 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions of 112th Congress 93% 2012 National Electrical Contractors Association - Positions 66% 2012 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100% 2012 United States Chamber of Commerce - Lifetime Score 100% 2011-2012 American Council of Engineering Companies - Positions 100 2011-2012 Independent Electrical Contractors - Positions (Senate) 75% 2011-2012 International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions 100 2011-2012 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 100% 2011-2012 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100% 2011-2012 National Retail Federation - Positions: Labor (Senate) 100% 2011-2012 National Retail Federation - Positions: International Trade 75% 2011-2012 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 88% 2011-2012 Plumbing-Heating-Cooling Contractors-National Association - Positions 83% 2011-2012 Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council - Positions 100% 2011 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 100% 2011 National Retail Federation - Positions 71% 2011 National Small Business Association - Positions 50% 2011 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 75% 2011 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 50% 2011 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 100%

Conservative

2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 56% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 61% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score (June 23, 2014) 58% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (June 23, 2014) 50% 2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 44% 2014 The John Birch Society - Lifetime Score 56% 2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 55% 2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 92% 2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 20% 2013 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 63% 2013 American Conservative Union - Positions 60% 2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 90% 2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 16% 2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 70% 2013 National Journal - Conservative (Composite) 69% 2013 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy 58% 2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 40% 2013 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 55 2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 64% 2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 48% 2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100% 2012 National Journal - Senate Conservative (Foreign) 62% 2012 National Journal - Senate Conservative (Composite Score) 62% 2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 42% 2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 58% 2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 67% 2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 66% 2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100% 2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 88% 2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 57% 2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 80% 2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 80% 2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 91% 2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 46% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 61% 2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 68% 2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 37% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 50% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 50% 2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 50%

Fiscally Conservative

2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 56% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 61% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score (June 23, 2014) 58% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (June 23, 2014) 50% 2014 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Positions 100 2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 44% 2013 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Workplace Choice (August, 2013) 100% 2013 FreedomWorks - Positions 41% 2013 The Club for Growth - Positions (lifetime) 55% 2013 The Club for Growth - Positions 58% 2012 FreedomWorks - Positions 31% 2012 National Journal - Senate Conservative (Economic) 59% 2012 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 48% 2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 66% 2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 67% 2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 57% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 10% 2011 FreedomWorks - Positions 61% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 61% 2011 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 74% 2011 The Club for Growth - Positions 66% 2008-2010 The Cato Institute - Tax Rate Score 65% 2008-2010 The Cato Institute - Revenue Score 82% 2008-2010 The Cato Institute - Spending Score 6% 2008-2010 The Cato Institute - Overall Fiscal Policy Score 51% 2003-2008 The Cato Institute - Tax Rate Score 68% 2003-2008 The Cato Institute - Revenue Score 56% 2003-2008 The Cato Institute - Overall Fiscal Policy Score 54% 2003-2008 The Cato Institute - Spending Score 39%

Socially Conservative

2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 44% 2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 44% 2014 The John Birch Society - Lifetime Score 56% 2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 55% 2014 The John Birch Society - Lifetime Score 56% 2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 55% 2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 92% 2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 92% 2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 20% 2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 20% 2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 90% 2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 90% 2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 16% 2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 16% 2013 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy 77% 2013 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy 77% 2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 40% 2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 40% 2012 Catholic Advocate - Positions 100% 2012 Catholic Advocate - Positions 100% 2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100% 2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100% 2012 Family Research Council - Positions 71% 2012 Family Research Council - Positions 71% 2012 National Journal - Senate Conservative (Social) 63% 2012 National Journal - Senate Conservative (Social) 63% 2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 58% 2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 58% 2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100% 2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100% 2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 88% 2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 88% 2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 57% 2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 57% 2011-2012 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100% 2011-2012 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100% 2011 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100% 2011 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100% 2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 91% 2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 91% 2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 46% 2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 46% 2011 Family Research Council - Positions 71% 2011 Family Research Council - Positions 71% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 83% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 83% 2011 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100% 2011 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 50% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 50% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 50% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 50%

Socially Liberal

2013-2014 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score (Jan. 13, 2014) 30% 2013-2014 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score (Jan. 13, 2014) 30% 2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes Lifetime Score 6% 2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Lifetime Score 19% 2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Lifetime Score 19% 2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Overall Positions 12% 2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Overall Positions 12% 2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes 2% 2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes 2% 2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes Lifetime Score 6% 2013 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 21% 2013 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 21% 2012 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 30% 2012 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 30% 2012 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0% 2012 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0% 2012 National Journal - Senate Liberal (Social) 36% 2012 National Journal - Senate Liberal (Social) 36% 2012 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 16% 2012 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 16% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 0% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 81% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 81% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 10% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 10% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 0% 2011 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 15% 2011 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 15% 2011 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0% 2011 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0% 2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 17% 2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 17%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.