Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

John H. Adler's Ratings and Endorsements

Business and Consumers

2010 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 100%
2010 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 43%
2009-2010 American Council of Engineering Companies - Positions 90%
2009-2010 Associated General Contractors of America - Positions 75%
2009-2010 Business-Industry Political Action Committee - Positions 40%
2009-2010 Independent Electrical Contractors - Positions 25%
2009-2010 International Warehouse Logistics Association - Positions 40%
2009-2010 National Association for the Self-Employed - U.S. House Score 100%
2009-2010 National Association of Manufacturers - Positions 56%
2009-2010 National Retail Federation - Positions 50%
2009-2010 National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association - Positions 66%
2009-2010 Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council - Positions 23%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 5%
2009 The National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association - Positions 40%
2009 United States Chamber of Commerce - Positions 47%
2006-2007 New Jersey National Federation of Independent Business - Positions on Pro-Small Business Policy 0
2004-2005 New Jersey National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 0%
2002-2003 New Jersey National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 50%
2000-2001 New Jersey National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 84%
1998-1999 New Jersey National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 70%
1994-1995 New Jersey Chamber of Commerce - Positions 63%

Campaign Finance and Elections

2009-2010 Arab American Institute - Positions 5%

Conservative

2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 15%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 13%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 22%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 53%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 49%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 10%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 25%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 25%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 30%
2009-2010 Faith and Freedom Coalition - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 15
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 62%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 23%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 40%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 28%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 16%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 16%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 27%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 9%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 50%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 55%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 21%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 20%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 22%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 58%

Socially Conservative

2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 22%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 22%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 53%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 53%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 10%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 10%
2009-2010 American Family Association - Positions 16%
2009-2010 American Family Association - Positions 16%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 25%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 25%
2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 30%
2009-2010 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 30%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 30%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 30%
2009-2010 Family Research Council - Positions 18%
2009-2010 Family Research Council - Positions 18%
2009-2010 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 16%
2009-2010 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 16%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 28%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 28%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 40%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 40%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 23%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 23%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 27%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 27%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 9%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 9%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 5%
2009 Heritage Alliance - Positions 5%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 37%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 37%
2009 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 0%
2009 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 0%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 14%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Positions on Personal Liberties 14%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 13%
2009 Republican Liberty Caucus - Economic Liberties Score 13%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 21%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 21%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 20%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 22%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 20%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 22%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top