Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Mark Hilton's Ratings and Endorsements

2010 Endorsements

Environment

2012 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2012 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 35%
2011 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 31%
2011 Environment North Carolina - Positions 0%
2011 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 17
2011 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 38
2010 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 37%
2010 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 67%
2009-2010 Environment North Carolina - Positions 40%
2009-2010 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 39
2009 Environment North Carolina - Positions 36%
2009 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 36%
2009 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 11%
2008 Environment North Carolina - Positions 20%
2008 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 36%
2007-2008 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 38%
2007 Environment North Carolina - Positions on Environmental Conservation 50
2007 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions on Environmental Conservation 50
2006 Environment North Carolina - Positions on Environmental Conservation 30
2006 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 38%
2005-2006 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 49%
2005 Environment North Carolina - Positions 44%
2005 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 60%
2003-2004 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 49%
2003 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 38%
2002 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 50%
2001 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top