or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

George 'G.K.' K. Butterfield, Jr.

George 'G.K.' K. Butterfield, Jr.'s Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Liberal

Full Name: George 'G.K.' K. Butterfield, Jr.
Current Office: U.S. House - District 1, Democratic
First Elected: 07/20/2004
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for U.S. House - District 1
General Nov. 4, 2014
Primary May 6, 2014

Liberal

2013-2014 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score (Jan. 13, 2014) 55%
2013-2014 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score (Jan. 13, 2014) 55%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Overall Positions 89%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Lifetime Score 90%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes 77%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Overall Positions 89%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes 77%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Lifetime Score 90%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes Lifetime Score 77%
2013-2014 Progressive Punch - Crucial Votes Lifetime Score 77%
2013 National Journal - Liberal (Composite) 71%
2013 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 73%
2013 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy 72%
2012 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 75%
2012 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 75%
2012 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2012 National Journal - House Liberal (Social) 69%
2012 National Journal - House Liberal (Composite Score) 73%
2012 National Journal - House Liberal (Foreign) 65%
2012 National Journal - House Liberal (Economic) 85%
2012 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 81%
2012 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 81%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 66%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 53%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 21%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 53%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 21%
2011 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 85%
2011 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 85%
2011 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 72%
2011 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 72%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 71%
2010 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 90%
2010 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 90%
2010 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 66%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 65%
2010 National Journal - Liberal Composite Score 73%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 11
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 11
2009-2010 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100%
2009-2010 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100%
2009 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2009 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 31%
2009 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 31%
2009 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 80%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 82%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 70%
2009 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 79%
2009 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100%
2009 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100%
2008 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
2008 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 100%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 75%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 76%
2008 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 78%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 78%
2008 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100%
2008 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 52%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 52%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Oath of Office Score 40%
2007-2008 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Oath of Office Score 40%
2007-2008 Progressive Democrats of America - Positions 44%
2007-2008 Progressive Democrats of America - Positions 44%
2007 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2007 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2007 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 100%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 74%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 63%
2007 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 67.2%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 63%
2007 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions on Social Justice and Peace 64
2007 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions on Social Justice and Peace 64
2006 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2006 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 95%
2006 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 65%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 68%
2006 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 69.2%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 65%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 73%
2006 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100%
2006 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Campaign for America's Future - Energy Score 100%
2005-2006 Campaign for America's Future - Energy Score 100%
2005-2006 Freedom Democrats - Positions on Economic Issues 10%
2005-2006 Freedom Democrats - Positions on Social Issues 73%
2005-2006 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Conservative Action Score 0%
2005-2006 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Conservative Action Score 0%
2005 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 85%
2005 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 85%
2005 Hope for Peace and Justice - Positions 100
2005 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 75%
2005 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 90%
2005 National Committee for an Effective Congress - Positions 90%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 77%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy Score 68%
2005 National Journal - Composite Liberal Score 68%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 59%
2005 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 83%
2005 NETWORK, A National Catholic Social Justice Lobby - Positions 83%
2004 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 35%
2004 Americans for Democratic Action - Positions 35%
2003-2004 Radical Middle - Positions 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top