Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Neal K. Hunt's Ratings and Endorsements

Environment

2014 Environment North Carolina - Positions 5
2013 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 55%
2013 Environment North Carolina - Positions 15%
2013 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Positions 52%
2013 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 30%
2012 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 65%
2012 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 25%
2011 Environment North Carolina - Positions 30%
2011 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 60%
2011 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 25%
2011 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 67%
2010 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 66%
2010 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 75%
2009-2010 Environment North Carolina - Positions 61%
2009-2010 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 68%
2009 Environment North Carolina - Positions 58%
2009 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 66%
2009 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 60%
2008 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 69%
2008 Environment North Carolina - Positions 70%
2007-2008 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 73%
2007 Environment North Carolina - Positions on Environmental Conservation 60
2007 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions on Environmental Conservation 83
2006 Environment North Carolina - Positions on Environmental Conservation 75
2006 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 80%
2005-2006 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 83%
2005 Environment North Carolina - Positions 71%
2005 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 86%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top