Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Jim Keane's Ratings and Endorsements

Office: State Senate (MT) - District 38, Democratic

Environment

2013 Montana Conservation Voters - Positions on Environmental Conservation 53%
2013 Montana Environmental Information Center - Positions 42%
2013 Northern Plains Resource Council - Positions 55%
2011 Montana Audubon - Positions 45%
2011 Montana Conservation Voters - Positions 50%
2011 Northern Plains Resource Council - Positions 36%
2009 Montana Audubon - Positions 56%
2009 Montana Conservation Voters - Positions 54%
2009 Montana Environmental Information Center - Positions 0%
2009 Montanans for Multiple Use - Positions 40%
2009 Northern Plains Resource Council - Positions 36%
2007 Montana Audubon - Positions 82
2007 Montana Conservation Voters - Positions on Environmental Conservation 46
2007 Montana Environmental Information Center - Positions 40%
2007 Montanans for Multiple Use - Positions on Public Land Access 43%
2007 Northern Plains Resource Council - Positions 50%
2005 Montana Audubon - Positions 80%
2005 Montana Conservation Voters - Positions 67%
2005 Montana Environmental Information Center - Positions 40%
2005 Montanans for Multiple Use - Positions on Public Land Access 38%
2005 Northern Plains Resource Council - Positions 60%
2003 Montana Audubon - Positions 83%
2003 Montana Conservation Voters - Positions 71%
2003 Montana Environmental Information Center - Positions 50%
2003 Northern Plains Resource Council - Positions 56%
2001 Montana Audubon - Positions 92%
2001 Montana Conservation Voters - Positions 82%
2001 Montana Environmental Information Center - Positions 85%
2001 Northern Plains Resource Council - Positions 90%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top