Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Doug Magnus's Ratings and Endorsements

2010 Endorsements

Labor Unions

2012 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 0%
2012 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions on Nursing, Health Care, and Workforce Issues 25%
2011 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Lifetime Score 12%
2011 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions 0%
2010 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 20%
2010 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 33%
2010 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Lifetime Score 36%
2010 Minnesota Nurses Association - Positions 26%
2009 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 0%
2009 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 12%
2009 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 29%
2009 SEIU Minnesota State Council - Positions 0%
2008 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions on Workplace Rights 20
2008 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 14
2008 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions on Workplace Rights 46
2007 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions on Workplace Rights 20
2007 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions on Workplace Rights 11
2007 SEIU Minnesota State Council - Positions on Workplace Rights 42%
2006 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 0%
2006 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 27%
2005 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 0%
2005 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 6%
2004 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 40%
2004 AFSCME Joint Councils 6, 14, 65, & 96, AFL-CIO - Positions 20%
2004 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 8%
2004 Minnesota Association of Professional Employees - Positions 20%
2003 AFSCME Council 5 - Positions 20%
2003 AFSCME Joint Councils 6, 14, 65, & 96, AFL-CIO - Positions 0%
2003 Minnesota AFL-CIO - Positions 19%

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

2008 OutFront Minnesota - Positions 8%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top